Trident: Detecting Face Forgeries with Adversarial Triplet Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As face forgeries generated by deep neural networks become increasingly sophisticated, detecting face manipulations in digital media has posed a significant challenge, underscoring the importance of maintaining digital media integrity and combating visual disinformation. Current detection models, predominantly based on supervised training with domain-specific data, often falter against forgeries generated by unencountered techniques. In response to this challenge, we introduce textitTrident, a face forgery detection framework that employs triplet learning with a Siamese network architecture for enhanced adaptability across diverse forgery methods. textitTrident is trained on curated triplets to isolate nuanced differences of forgeries, capturing fine-grained features that distinguish pristine samples from manipulated ones while controlling for other variables. To further enhance generalizability, we incorporate domain-adversarial training with a forgery discriminator. This adversarial component guides our embedding model towards forgery-agnostic representations, improving its robustness to unseen manipulations. In addition, we prevent gradient flow from the classifier head to the embedding model, avoiding overfitting induced by artifacts peculiar to certain forgeries. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple benchmarks and ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework. We will release our code in a GitHub repository.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2025.
Builds on
54 of 86 references.
References · 54
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
38 more
- 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 632
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
- 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
- 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 319
- 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 297
- 2020Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detectioncited by 287
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
- 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 262
- 2019On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulationcited by 260
- 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
- 2019The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Datasetcited by 209
- 2018Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videoscited by 180
- 2023UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 180
- 2020Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detectioncited by 179
- 2023DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detectioncited by 166
- 2021Frequency-aware Discriminative Feature Learning Supervised by Single-Center Loss for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 134
- 2023Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 127
- 2022Implicit Identity Leakage: The Stumbling Block to Improving Deepfake Detection Generalizationcited by 123
- 2021M2TR: Multi-modal Multi-scale Transformers for Deepfake Detectioncited by 114
- 2024Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 105
- 2023TALL: Thumbnail Layout for Deepfake Video Detectioncited by 100
- 2022Protecting Celebrities from DeepFake with Identity Consistency Transformercited by 95
- 2024LAA-Net: Localized Artifact Attention Network for Quality-Agnostic and Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 89
- 2021Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 88
- 2022CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 74
- 2022UIA-ViT: Unsupervised Inconsistency-Aware Method based on Vision Transformer for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 69
- 2022MARLIN: Masked Autoencoder for facial video Representation LearnINgcited by 57
- 2022Voice-Face Homogeneity Tells Deepfakecited by 44
- 2021Video Transformer for Deepfake Detection with Incremental Learningcited by 33
- 2021DeepfakeUCL: Deepfake Detection via Unsupervised Contrastive Learningcited by 20
- 2020Detecting Deepfakes with Metric Learningcited by 16
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.