mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision

arXiv 2506.01926 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 32

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning not only enhances large language model performance but also provides critical insights into decision-making processes, marking it as a useful tool for monitoring model intent and planning. However, recent works have shown that banning the mention of a specific example of reward hacking causes obfuscation of the undesired reasoning traces but the persistence of the undesired behavior, threatening the reliability of CoT monitoring. We provide an extension to these results with regard to the ability of models to learn a specific type of obfuscated reasoning: steganography. First, we show that penalizing the use of specific strings within load-bearing reasoning traces causes models to substitute alternative strings. Crucially, this does not alter the underlying method by which the model performs the task, demonstrating that the model can learn to steganographically encode its reasoning.We further demonstrate that models can generalize an encoding scheme. When the penalized strings belong to an overarching class, the model learns not only to substitute strings seen in training, but also develops a general encoding scheme for all members of the class which it can apply to held-out testing strings.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

Builds on

20 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation14 Mar
  2. 2024Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Models24 Apr
  3. 2023Preventing Language Models From Hiding Their Reasoning27 Oct
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan

Other references · 16

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  4. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  6. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  7. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  8. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
  9. 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 377
  10. 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 360
  11. 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 290
  12. 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 287
4 more
  1. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 229
  2. 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganographycited by 113
  3. 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 55
  4. 2024Explore Theory of Mind: Program-guided adversarial data generation for theory of mind reasoningcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 24.

32 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Reasoning Models Struggle to Control their Chains of Thoughtcited by 25
  2. 2025Teaching Models to Verbalize Reward Hacking in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 21
  3. 2025Measuring Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Faithfulness and Verbositycited by 17
  4. 2025A Pragmatic Way to Measure Chain-of-Thought Monitorabilitycited by 13
  5. 2026Dynamics Within Latent Chain-of-Thought: An Empirical Study of Causal Structurecited by 11
  6. 2026Analyzing and Improving Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Information Theorycited by 10
  7. 2026The Illusion of Insight in Reasoning Modelscited by 9
  8. 2026A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoringcited by 8
  9. 2026Stateless Yet Not Forgetful: Implicit Memory as a Hidden Channel in LLMscited by 6
  10. 2025Manipulation Attacks by Misaligned AI: Risk Analysis and Safety Case Frameworkcited by 5
  11. 2025State over Tokens: Characterizing the Role of Reasoning Tokenscited by 5
  12. 2026Chain-of-thought obfuscation learned from output supervision can generalise to unseen taskscited by 5
20 more
  1. 2026Aligned, Orthogonal or In-conflict: When can we safely optimize Chain-of-Thought?cited by 5
  2. 2026Tool Use Enables Undetectable Steganography in Multi-Agent LLM Systemscited by 5
  3. 2025Language Models and Logic Programs for Trustworthy Tax Reasoningcited by 4
  4. 2025Unsupervised decoding of encoded reasoning using language model interpretabilitycited by 4
  5. 2026Training on Documents About Monitoring Leads to CoT Obfuscationcited by 3
  6. 2025A Concrete Roadmap towards Safety Cases based on Chain-of-Thought Monitoringcited by 2
  7. 2026Diagnosing Pathological Chain-of-Thought in Reasoning Modelscited by 2
  8. 2026Train the Model, Not the Reader: Decodability Supervision for Verifiable Activation Explanationscited by 2
  9. 2026Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settingscited by 2
  10. 2026Not Just the Destination, But the Journey: Reasoning Traces Causally Shape Generalization Behaviorscited by 1
  11. 2026Despite Instructions: Frontier Agents Improvise Covert Channels at Test Timecited by 1
  12. 2026NEST: Nascent Encoded Steganographic Thoughtscited by 0
  13. 2026Disentangling Deception and Hallucination Failures in LLMscited by 0
  14. 2026Risk Reporting for Developers' Internal AI Model Usecited by 0
  15. 2026Tandem Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 0
  16. 2026Monitor Jailbreaking: Evading Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Without Encoded Reasoningcited by 0
  17. 2026Towards Mitigating Deceptive Safety Alignment in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 0
  18. 2026Correct Answers, Invalid Traces: What Verifiable Grade-School Math Reveals About Chain-of-Thought Tracescited by 0
  19. 2026Learning Steganography Is Easy, Learning Steganographic Reasoning Is Hardcited by 0
  20. 2026Monitorability Disposition in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Conceptual Steganography
  2. 2025The Steganographic Potentials of Language Models
  3. 2025Can Reasoning Models Obfuscate Reasoning? Stress-Testing Chain-of-Thought Monitorability
  4. 2024Understanding Hidden Computations in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  5. 2026The Illusion of Reasoning: Exposing Evasive Data Contamination in LLMs via Zero-CoT Truncation
  6. 2026The Fragility of Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Across Typologically Diverse Languages
  7. 2026Taming CoT Obfuscation in VLMs: From Mechanistic Evidence to Activation Enforcement
  8. 2025Output Supervision Can Obfuscate the Chain of Thought