Taming CoT Obfuscation in VLMs: From Mechanistic Evidence to Activation Enforcement
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) improves reasoning in vision-language models (VLMs) but can induce chain-of-thought (CoT) obfuscation: an operational, non-intentional outcome where task reward or accuracy rises while traces become less grounded and monitorable. Prior work largely documents this decay behaviorally, leaving its representation-level correlates and actionable controls unclear. We find that template- and ground-associated activations become less separable during RL; matched interventions support the contribution of selected features to monitorability degradation. Guided by this evidence, we propose Targeted Anti-obfuscation with Mechanistic Enforcement (TAME), which uses Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to combine behavioral feedback with targeted suppression of template-associated activations during RL. Its asymmetric constraint penalizes template activations only above their pre-RL baseline, anchoring the localized features while behavioral feedback promotes grounded refinements. Across VIRL-39k, SPA-VL, and two model families, TAME improves CoT monitorability by up to 30.9 and 16.7 percentage points over Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), respectively. Blinded human evaluation finds higher human monitorability on both datasets, and two held-out monitor families reproduce the monitorability gains. Task accuracy changes are small and mixed, and general-capability benchmarks show task-specific trade-offs. These results provide a path from behavioral monitoring to representation-level oversight for more auditable RL-trained multimodal systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 54 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.
Builds on
54 of 62 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 53
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 815
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 512
- 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 455
38 more
- 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 384
- 2024Navigating the Digital World as Humans Do: Universal Visual Grounding for GUI Agentscited by 382
- 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 332
- 2025VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 323
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 249
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
- 2024Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoningcited by 136
- 2025GRIT: Teaching MLLMs to Think with Imagescited by 125
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
- 2024Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 110
- 2025When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitorscited by 88
- 2024SPA-VL: A Comprehensive Safety Preference Alignment Dataset for Vision Language Modelcited by 85
- 2025Monitoring Monitorabilitycited by 58
- 2025Measuring Chain of Thought Faithfulness by Unlearning Reasoning Stepscited by 47
- 2023Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 45
- 2025Reinforced MLLM: A Survey on RL-Based Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2024MEGA-Bench: Scaling Multimodal Evaluation to over 500 Real-World Taskscited by 41
- 2025Same Task, Different Circuits: Disentangling Modality-Specific Mechanisms in VLMscited by 35
- 2023Chain of Thought Prompt Tuning in Vision Language Modelscited by 34
- 2025ChartMuseum: Testing Visual Reasoning Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 32
- 2026Reasoning Models Struggle to Control their Chains of Thoughtcited by 25
- 2024Large Multi-modal Models Can Interpret Features in Large Multi-modal Modelscited by 23
- 2025Can Reasoning Models Obfuscate Reasoning? Stress-Testing Chain-of-Thought Monitorabilitycited by 22
- 2026Experiential Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
- 2025How does Chain of Thought Think? Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Sparse Autoencodingcited by 19
- 2025Measuring Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Faithfulness and Verbositycited by 17
- 2026Counterfactual Simulation Training for Chain-of-Thought Faithfulnesscited by 17
- 2025Chain-of-Thought Hijackingcited by 16
- 2025Output Supervision Can Obfuscate the Chain of Thoughtcited by 13
- 2026On Robustness and Chain-of-Thought Consistency of RL-Finetuned VLMscited by 11
- 2026Analyzing and Improving Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Information Theorycited by 10
- 2025Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2025Investigating CoT Monitorability in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 9
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability for Large Language Model Alignment: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 8
- 2026MonitorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025MSR-Align: Policy-Grounded Multimodal Alignment for Safety-Aware Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Unveiling and Causalizing CoT: A Causal Pespectivecited by 6
- 2025GuardTrace-VL: Detecting Unsafe Multimodel Reasoning via Iterative Safety Supervisioncited by 4
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025DeepThinkVLA: Enhancing Reasoning Capability of Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026What does RL improve for Visual Reasoning? A Frankenstein-Style Analysis
- 2025Rethinking RL Scaling for Vision Language Models: A Transparent, From-Scratch Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme
- 2026Monitorability as a Free Gift: How RLVR Spontaneously Aligns Reasoning
- 2025Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision
- 2025VL-GenRM: Enhancing Vision-Language Verification via Vision Experts and Iterative Training
- 2025Reassessing the Role of Supervised Fine-Tuning: An Empirical Study in VLM Reasoning