Understanding Hidden Computations in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has significantly enhanced the reasoning abilities of large language models. However, recent studies have shown that models can still perform complex reasoning tasks even when the CoT is replaced with filler(hidden) characters (e.g., "..."), leaving open questions about how models internally process and represent reasoning steps. In this paper, we investigate methods to decode these hidden characters in transformer models trained with filler CoT sequences. By analyzing layer-wise representations using the logit lens method and examining token rankings, we demonstrate that the hidden characters can be recovered without loss of performance. Our findings provide insights into the internal mechanisms of transformer models and open avenues for improving interpretability and transparency in language model reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2024.
Builds on
6 of 8 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning17 Jul
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting7 May
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan
Other references · 3
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMscited by 150
- 2023Question Decomposition Improves the Faithfulness of Model-Generated Reasoningcited by 107
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning?cited by 15
- 2025Pause Tokens Strictly Increase the Expressivity of Constant-Depth Transformerscited by 8
- 2025Learning to Ponder: Adaptive Reasoning in Latent Spacecited by 4
- 2026Opening the Black Box: A Survey on the Mechanisms of Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Opening the Black Box: A Survey on the Mechanisms of Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models2 Jan 2026
- 2025Learning to Ponder: Adaptive Reasoning in Latent Space29 Sep 2025
- 2025How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning?29 May 2025
- 2025Pause Tokens Strictly Increase the Expressivity of Constant-Depth Transformers27 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Latent Chain-of-Thought? Decoding the Depth-Recurrent Transformer
- 2026J-CoT: Chain-of-Thought in J-Space
- 2025How does Chain of Thought Think? Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoding
- 2026Detecting Hidden Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Linguistic, Behavioral, and Mechanistic Indicators
- 2025Deep Hidden Cognition Facilitates Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
- 2024Deciphering the Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Chain-of-Thought: Probability, Memorization, and Noisy Reasoning
- 2025Explainable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis on State-Aware Reasoning Dynamics
- 2024Expediting and Elevating Large Language Model Reasoning via Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding