The Steganographic Potentials of Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
The potential for large language models (LLMs) to hide messages within plain text (steganography) poses a challenge to detection and thwarting of unaligned AI agents, and undermines faithfulness of LLMs reasoning. We explore the steganographic capabilities of LLMs fine-tuned via reinforcement learning (RL) to: (1) develop covert encoding schemes, (2) engage in steganography when prompted, and (3) utilize steganography in realistic scenarios where hidden reasoning is likely, but not prompted. In these scenarios, we detect the intention of LLMs to hide their reasoning as well as their steganography performance. Our findings in the fine-tuning experiments as well as in behavioral non fine-tuning evaluations reveal that while current models exhibit rudimentary steganographic abilities in terms of security and capacity, explicit algorithmic guidance markedly enhances their capacity for information concealment.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2019Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systemscited by 250
- 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 207
- 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 193
- 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 159
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
- 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?cited by 101
- 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 52
- 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 42
1 more
- 2021Provably Secure Generative Linguistic Steganographycited by 34
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.
10 papers.
- 2025Measuring Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Faithfulness and Verbositycited by 15
- 2025All Code, No Thought: Current Language Models Struggle to Reason in Ciphered Languagecited by 7
- 2025Unsupervised decoding of encoded reasoning using language model interpretabilitycited by 3
- 2026Towards Worst-Case Guarantees with Scale-Aware Interpretabilitycited by 3
- 2026Invisible Safety Threat: Malicious Finetuning for LLM via Steganographycited by 2
- 2026NEST: Nascent Encoded Steganographic Thoughtscited by 0
- 2026Agentic AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and the Institutional Turn: Legal Architectures and Financial Governance in the Age of Distributional AGIcited by 0
- 2026Tandem Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 0
- 2026Synchronized Logit Steering: Real-world Steganographycited by 0
- 2026For Your Eyes Only: Evaluating Coordination Between Isolated Language Model Instancescited by 0
- 2026For Your Eyes Only: Evaluating Coordination Between Isolated Language Model Instances16 Sep 2026
- 2026Synchronized Logit Steering: Real-world Steganography9 Aug 2026
- 2026Tandem Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards26 Jun 2026
- 2026Invisible Safety Threat: Malicious Finetuning for LLM via Steganography9 Mar 2026
- 2026Agentic AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and the Institutional Turn: Legal Architectures and Financial Governance in the Age of Distributional AGI20 Feb 2026
- 2026NEST: Nascent Encoded Steganographic Thoughts15 Feb 2026
- 2026Towards Worst-Case Guarantees with Scale-Aware Interpretability5 Feb 2026
- 2025Unsupervised decoding of encoded reasoning using language model interpretability1 Dec 2025
- 2025Measuring Chain-of-Thought Monitorability Through Faithfulness and Verbosity31 Oct 2025
- 2025All Code, No Thought: Current Language Models Struggle to Reason in Ciphered Language10 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Learning Steganography Is Easy, Learning Steganographic Reasoning Is Hard
- 2025Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision
- 2026Conceptual Steganography
- 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography
- 2026A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoring
- 2026Tool Use Enables Undetectable Steganography in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2025Verifying LLM Inference to Detect Model Weight Exfiltration
- 2025TrojanStego: Your Language Model Can Secretly Be A Steganographic Privacy Leaking Agent