mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Steganographic Potentials of Language Models

arXiv 2505.03439 ↗First posted 6 May 2025cs.AI cs.CR cs.LGcited by 10

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

The potential for large language models (LLMs) to hide messages within plain text (steganography) poses a challenge to detection and thwarting of unaligned AI agents, and undermines faithfulness of LLMs reasoning. We explore the steganographic capabilities of LLMs fine-tuned via reinforcement learning (RL) to: (1) develop covert encoding schemes, (2) engage in steganography when prompted, and (3) utilize steganography in realistic scenarios where hidden reasoning is likely, but not prompted. In these scenarios, we detect the intention of LLMs to hide their reasoning as well as their steganography performance. Our findings in the fine-tuning experiments as well as in behavioral non fine-tuning evaluations reveal that while current models exhibit rudimentary steganographic abilities in terms of security and capacity, explicit algorithmic guidance markedly enhances their capacity for information concealment.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2025.

Builds on

14 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Preventing Language Models From Hiding Their Reasoning27 Oct

Other references · 13

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
  4. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  5. 2019Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systemscited by 250
  6. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 207
  7. 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 193
  8. 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 159
  9. 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
  10. 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?cited by 101
  11. 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 52
  12. 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 42
1 more
  1. 2021Provably Secure Generative Linguistic Steganographycited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Steganography Is Easy, Learning Steganographic Reasoning Is Hard
  2. 2025Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision
  3. 2026Conceptual Steganography
  4. 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography
  5. 2026A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoring
  6. 2026Tool Use Enables Undetectable Steganography in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  7. 2025Verifying LLM Inference to Detect Model Weight Exfiltration
  8. 2025TrojanStego: Your Language Model Can Secretly Be A Steganographic Privacy Leaking Agent