mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From homeostasis to resource sharing: Biologically and economically aligned multi-objective multi-agent gridworld-based AI safety benchmarks

arXiv 2410.00081 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.MA cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing safe, aligned agentic AI systems requires comprehensive empirical testing, yet many existing benchmarks neglect crucial themes aligned with biology and economics, both time-tested fundamental sciences describing our needs and preferences. To address this gap, the present work focuses on introducing biologically and economically motivated themes that have been neglected in current mainstream discussions on AI safety - namely a set of multi-objective, multi-agent alignment benchmarks that emphasize homeostasis for bounded and biological objectives, diminishing returns for unbounded, instrumental, and business objectives, sustainability principle, and resource sharing. Eight main benchmark environments have been implemented on the above themes, to illustrate key pitfalls and challenges in agentic AI-s, such as unboundedly maximizing a homeostatic objective, over-optimizing one objective at the expense of others, neglecting safety constraints, or depleting shared resources.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

3 of 24 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  2. 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 220
  3. 2021Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)cited by 55

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents
  2. 2026Beyond single-channel agentic benchmarking
  3. 2026Institutional AI: A Governance Framework for Distributional AGI Safety
  4. 2023Of Models and Tin Men: A Behavioural Economics Study of Principal-Agent Problems in AI Alignment using Large-Language Models
  5. 2025Free Energy Risk Metrics for Systemically Safe AI: Gatekeeping Multi-Agent Study
  6. 2023Intent-aligned AI systems deplete human agency: the need for agency foundations research in AI safety
  7. 2026Grounded Scaling: Why Agentic AI Needs Deterministic Environments
  8. 2024Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents, Humans, and Environment