Character Training for Risk-Averse Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Risk aversion in resources could prevent misaligned AI agents from causing catastrophic harm. Misaligned but risk-averse agents would tend to favor safer strategies like making deals with humans over riskier strategies like rebelling. We train agents to be risk averse through character training, finding that persona traits provide a robust mechanism for instilling risk preferences. To do this, we construct a model constitution describing constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) over an agent's resources and instill it through on-policy distillation. Despite never seeing the benchmark's decision format during training, character-trained models are competitive with baselines trained directly on it, and generalise better than them out of distribution on two of our four models. We also modulate different aspects of the constitution, finding that token budget and model choice are the most influential aspect of character training to instill risk aversion. We conclude from these results that character training is a promising and scalable way to instil broad dispositions, which we can use to our advantage in mitigating risk from misaligned AI agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 56 references.
References · 22
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2024Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Modelscited by 308
- 2025Model Organisms for Emergent Misalignmentcited by 91
- 2026Alignment Pretraining: AI Discourse Causes Self-Fulfilling (Mis)alignmentcited by 33
- 2024STEER: Assessing the Economic Rationality of Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2025Open Character Training: Shaping the Persona of AI Assistants through Constitutional AIcited by 24
- 2026Model Spec Midtraining: Improving How Alignment Training Generalizescited by 20
10 more
- 2025Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource Constraintscited by 5
- 2025The LLM Has Left The Chat: Evidence of Bail Preferences in Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2024A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problemscited by 4
- 2026When Role-playing, Do Models Believe What They Say?cited by 4
- 2026Persona Cartography: Charting Language Model Personality Traits in Weight Spacecited by 4
- 2026Constitutional Midtraining: Content Presence Drives Alignment Gainscited by 4
- 2026Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Risk Aversion in Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Shared SFT Lessons Across Alignment, Model Organisms, and Toy Modelscited by 1
- 2026A dataset of rated conceptual argumentscited by 1
- 2026Stress-testing Alignment Midtrainingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Emotional Cost Functions for AI Safety: Teaching Agents to Feel the Weight of Irreversible Consequences
- 2023Absolutist AI
- 2026Learning Safe Agent Behaviour from Human Preferences and Justifications via World Models
- 2023Of Models and Tin Men: A Behavioural Economics Study of Principal-Agent Problems in AI Alignment using Large-Language Models
- 2026Emergent alignment and the projectability of ethical personas
- 2025Evaluating and Aligning Human Economic Risk Preferences in LLMs
- 2026Alignment Risks from Capability-Seeking RL Training
- 2026Persona-Conditioned Risk Behavior in Large Language Models: A Simulated Gambling Study with GPT-4.1