Runtime Analysis of the (1+(λ,λ)) Genetic Algorithm on Random Satisfiable 3-CNF Formulas
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The (1+(λ,λ)) genetic algorithm, first proposed at GECCO 2013, showed a surprisingly good performance on so me optimization problems. The theoretical analysis so far was restricted to the OneMax test function, where this GA profited from the perfect fitness-distance correlation. In this work, we conduct a rigorous runtime analysis of this GA on random 3-SAT instances in the planted solution model having at least logarithmic average degree, which are known to have a weaker fitness distance correlation. We prove that this GA with fixed not too large population size again obtains runtimes better than Theta(n log n), which is a lower bound for most evolutionary algorithms on pseudo-Boolean problems with unique optimum. However, the self-adjusting version of the GA risks reaching population sizes at which the intermediate selection of the GA, due to the weaker fitness-distance correlation, is not able to distinguish a profitable offspring from others. We show that this problem can be overcome by equipping the self-adjusting GA with an upper limit for the population size. Apart from sparse instances, this limit can be chosen in a way that the asymptotic performance does not worsen compared to the idealistic OneMax case. Overall, this work shows that the (1+(λ,λ)) GA can provably have a good performance on combinatorial search and optimization problems also in the presence of a weaker fitness-distance correlation.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Lazy Parameter Tuning and Control: Choosing All Parameters Randomly From a Power-Law Distributioncited by 11
- 2021Choosing the Right Algorithm With Hints From Complexity Theorycited by 5
- 2023Using Automated Algorithm Configuration for Parameter Controlcited by 5
- 2022The (1+(λ,λ)) Global SEMO Algorithmcited by 3
- 2025Multi-parameter Control for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2021Frequency Fitness Assignment: Optimization without Bias for Good Solutions can be Efficientcited by 0
- 2023Larger Offspring Populations Help the (1 + (λ, λ)) Genetic Algorithm to Overcome the Noisecited by 0
- 2025Multi-parameter Control for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax via Deep Reinforcement Learning19 May 2025
- 2023Larger Offspring Populations Help the (1 + (λ, λ)) Genetic Algorithm to Overcome the Noise8 May 2023
- 2023Using Automated Algorithm Configuration for Parameter Control23 Feb 2023
- 2022The (1+(λ,λ)) Global SEMO Algorithm7 Oct 2022
- 2021Frequency Fitness Assignment: Optimization without Bias for Good Solutions can be Efficient1 Dec 2021
- 2021Choosing the Right Algorithm With Hints From Complexity Theory14 Sep 2021
- 2021Lazy Parameter Tuning and Control: Choosing All Parameters Randomly From a Power-Law Distribution14 Apr 2021