Modeling Multiple Normal Action Representations for Error Detection in Procedural Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Error detection in procedural activities is essential for consistent and correct outcomes in AR-assisted and robotic systems. Existing methods often focus on temporal ordering errors or rely on static prototypes to represent normal actions. However, these approaches typically overlook the common scenario where multiple, distinct actions are valid following a given sequence of executed actions. This leads to two issues: (1) the model cannot effectively detect errors using static prototypes when the inference environment or action execution distribution differs from training; and (2) the model may also use the wrong prototypes to detect errors if the ongoing action label is not the same as the predicted one. To address this problem, we propose an Adaptive Multiple Normal Action Representation (AMNAR) framework. AMNAR predicts all valid next actions and reconstructs their corresponding normal action representations, which are compared against the ongoing action to detect errors. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AMNAR achieves state-of-the-art performance, highlighting the effectiveness of AMNAR and the importance of modeling multiple valid next actions in error detection. The code is available at https://github.com/iSEE-Laboratory/AMNAR.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
36 of 50 references.
References · 36
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
- 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
- 2016Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Segmentation and Detectioncited by 508
- 2023Ego-Exo4D: Understanding Skilled Human Activity from First- and Third-Person Perspectivescited by 490
- 2019MS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentationcited by 373
- 2022ActionFormer: Localizing Moments of Actions with Transformerscited by 311
- 2022Assembly101: A Large-Scale Multi-View Video Dataset for Understanding Procedural Activitiescited by 287
- 2021ASFormer: Transformer for Action Segmentationcited by 168
- 2023HoloAssist: an Egocentric Human Interaction Dataset for Interactive AI Assistants in the Real Worldcited by 166
- 2021A Hybrid Video Anomaly Detection Framework via Memory-Augmented Flow Reconstruction and Flow-Guided Frame Predictioncited by 129
- 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 125
24 more
- 2021Self-Supervised Predictive Convolutional Attentive Block for Anomaly Detectioncited by 119
- 2024Selective Hourglass Mapping for Universal Image Restoration Based on Diffusion Modelcited by 73
- 2022Future Transformer for Long-term Action Anticipationcited by 58
- 2023Open-VCLIP: Transforming CLIP to an Open-vocabulary Video Model via Interpolated Weight Optimizationcited by 55
- 2023Video Event Restoration Based on Keyframes for Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 54
- 2023CaptainCook4D: A Dataset for Understanding Errors in Procedural Activitiescited by 51
- 2023IndustReal: A Dataset for Procedure Step Recognition Handling Execution Errors in Egocentric Videos in an Industrial-Like Settingcited by 48
- 2024PREGO: online mistake detection in PRocedural EGOcentric videoscited by 39
- 2023Self-Distilled Masked Auto-Encoders are Efficient Video Anomaly Detectorscited by 37
- 2024EgoExo-Fitness: Towards Egocentric and Exocentric Full-Body Action Understandingcited by 36
- 2024Can't make an Omelette without Breaking some Eggs: Plausible Action Anticipation using Large Video-Language Modelscited by 33
- 2024Differentiable Task Graph Learning: Procedural Activity Representation and Online Mistake Detection from Egocentric Videoscited by 26
- 2024Mitigating the Human-Robot Domain Discrepancy in Visual Pre-training for Robotic Manipulationcited by 23
- 2023Event-Guided Procedure Planning from Instructional Videos with Text Supervisioncited by 21
- 2024Multimodal Action Quality Assessmentcited by 20
- 2023Diversifying Spatial-Temporal Perception for Video Domain Generalizationcited by 19
- 2023Every Mistake Counts in Assemblycited by 18
- 2023DiffuVolume: Diffusion Model for Volume based Stereo Matchingcited by 16
- 2024XOV-Action: Towards Generalizable Open-Vocabulary Action Recognitioncited by 15
- 2023Continual Action Assessment via Task-Consistent Score-Discriminative Feature Distribution Modelingcited by 12
- 2024ActionHub: A Large-scale Action Video Description Dataset for Zero-shot Action Recognitioncited by 8
- 2024Human-Centric Transformer for Domain Adaptive Action Recognitioncited by 8
- 2024TechCoach: Towards Technical-Point-Aware Descriptive Action Coachingcited by 6
- 2025Task-Oriented 6-DoF Grasp Pose Detection in Clutterscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 7.
12 papers.
- 2025Procedural Mistake Detection via Action Effect Modelingcited by 6
- 2025Building Egocentric Procedural AI Assistant: Methods, Benchmarks, and Challengescited by 5
- 2026MistExit: Learning to Exit for Early Mistake Detection in Procedural Videoscited by 2
- 2026The Unreasonable Effectiveness of VLMs for Zero-shot Procedural Mistake Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Mistake Attribution: Fine-Grained Mistake Understanding in Egocentric Videoscited by 1
- 2025ProcObject-10K: Benchmarking Object-Centric Procedural Understanding in Instructional Videoscited by 1
- 2026ESTANet: Efficient Online Error Detection in Procedural Videos via Prediction Inconsistencycited by 1
- 2026Post-Training VLMs for Video Mistake Detectioncited by 1
- 2026PROVIA: Procedure State Tracking for Online Mistake Detection in Egocentric Videoscited by 1
- 2025Vision-Based Mistake Analysis in Procedural Activities: A Review of Advances and Challengescited by 0
- 2026PhysiGen: Integrating Collision-Aware Physical Constraints for High-Fidelity Human-Human Interaction Generationcited by 0
- 2026Hand-Aware Transition Modeling for Bimanual Procedural Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Hand-Aware Transition Modeling for Bimanual Procedural Anomaly Detection18 Sep 2026
- 2026PROVIA: Procedure State Tracking for Online Mistake Detection in Egocentric Videos17 Sep 2026
- 2026Post-Training VLMs for Video Mistake Detection28 Aug 2026
- 2026ESTANet: Efficient Online Error Detection in Procedural Videos via Prediction Inconsistency24 Jun 2026
- 2026The Unreasonable Effectiveness of VLMs for Zero-shot Procedural Mistake Detection19 Jun 2026
- 2026PhysiGen: Integrating Collision-Aware Physical Constraints for High-Fidelity Human-Human Interaction Generation1 May 2026
- 2026MistExit: Learning to Exit for Early Mistake Detection in Procedural Videos15 Mar 2026
- 2025ProcObject-10K: Benchmarking Object-Centric Procedural Understanding in Instructional Videos3 Dec 2025
- 2025Procedural Mistake Detection via Action Effect Modeling3 Dec 2025
- 2025Mistake Attribution: Fine-Grained Mistake Understanding in Egocentric Videos25 Nov 2025
- 2025Building Egocentric Procedural AI Assistant: Methods, Benchmarks, and Challenges17 Nov 2025
- 2025Vision-Based Mistake Analysis in Procedural Activities: A Review of Advances and Challenges22 Oct 2025