Hand-Aware Transition Modeling for Bimanual Procedural Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Procedural anomaly detection in bimanual assembly requires judging each hand action against the execution so far. A corrective action may look unusual in isolation, while a visually plausible action can violate the order of the procedure. We present HACT, a transition model over predicted per-hand events. A role-preserving history keeps the concurrent responsibilities of both hands, and a marked temporal point process assigns each observed transition a semantic and temporal surprisal. A supervised evidence head and a two-state filter convert these surprisals into per-hand anomaly posteriors. A recovery-aware protocol on predicted events and participant-disjoint folds reports the recovery false-positive rate at an operating point selected on validation participants. On two bimanual power-tool procedures HACT has the highest AUPRC and F1 among the compared methods and the fewest recovery alarms. Applied without retraining to a different assembly order of the same product, it retains the highest AUPRC and F1. The source code is available at https://github.com/Kratos-Wen/HACT.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.
Builds on
24 of 29 references.
References · 24
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
- 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 528
- 2016Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Segmentation and Detectioncited by 508
- 2022Assembly101: A Large-Scale Multi-View Video Dataset for Understanding Procedural Activitiescited by 287
- 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
- 2023HoloAssist: an Egocentric Human Interaction Dataset for Interactive AI Assistants in the Real Worldcited by 166
- 2023CaptainCook4D: A Dataset for Understanding Errors in Procedural Activitiescited by 51
- 2023IndustReal: A Dataset for Procedure Step Recognition Handling Execution Errors in Egocentric Videos in an Industrial-Like Settingcited by 48
- 2024PREGO: online mistake detection in PRocedural EGOcentric videoscited by 39
- 2024Differentiable Task Graph Learning: Procedural Activity Representation and Online Mistake Detection from Egocentric Videoscited by 26
- 2023ATTACH Dataset: Annotated Two-Handed Assembly Actions for Human Action Understandingcited by 14
12 more
- 2025Modeling Multiple Normal Action Representations for Error Detection in Procedural Taskscited by 12
- 2024TI-PREGO: Chain of Thought and In-Context Learning for Online Mistake Detection in PRocedural EGOcentric Videoscited by 10
- 2026IMPACT: A Dataset for Multi-Granularity Human Procedural Action Understanding in Industrial Assemblycited by 8
- 2021Detecting Anomalous Event Sequences with Temporal Point Processescited by 6
- 2025Procedural Mistake Detection via Action Effect Modelingcited by 6
- 2026How to Correctly Make Mistakes: A Framework for Constructing and Benchmarking Mistake Aware Egocentric Procedural Videoscited by 2
- 2026IMPACT-HOI: Supervisory Control for Onset-Anchored Partial HOI Event Constructioncited by 2
- 2026The Unreasonable Effectiveness of VLMs for Zero-shot Procedural Mistake Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Mistake Attribution: Fine-Grained Mistake Understanding in Egocentric Videoscited by 1
- 2026Understanding-Enhanced Model Collaboration for Long-Tailed Egocentric Mistake Detectioncited by 1
- 2026ESTANet: Efficient Online Error Detection in Procedural Videos via Prediction Inconsistencycited by 1
- 2026Post-Training VLMs for Video Mistake Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.