PROVIA: Procedure State Tracking for Online Mistake Detection in Egocentric Videos
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An assistant watching egocentric video should notice a mistake from past frames alone, before the next step begins, and keep working once the person recovers. A mistake changes the state of the work, so every later step has to be read against what was done rather than against the plan. The first-mistake protocol that current online methods report on cuts each recording at its first mistake, so a fixed-time rule that never looks at the video is right on every case. We evaluate on complete trials, where mistakes and recoveries arise naturally, under a validation false-alarm budget and against controls that use timing alone. PROVIA keeps two records apart: a factual state, a learned summary of the steps each actor performed, mistakes included, and the accepted progress, an exact posterior over the state of an automaton induced from correct demonstrations by Bayesian state merging and over the execution status of each actor. Procedure-state transitions occur only in the correct-status branch; the mistake and correction branches retain the source state. A sequential test turns the per-frame mistake probability into alarms. With one filter and one optimization rule, PROVIA ranks mistakes best among the evaluated controlled baselines on CaptainCook4D, IndustReal, HoloAssist and IMPACT-ego. At a validation budget of 0.1 false alarms per minute it recalls .154 against .128 on CaptainCook4D and .034 against .015 on HoloAssist, where it leads at every budget. The pipeline runs at 58-70 frames per second. The source code is available at https://github.com/Kratos-Wen/PROVIA.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.
Builds on
19 of 27 references.
References · 19
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2022Assembly101: A Large-Scale Multi-View Video Dataset for Understanding Procedural Activitiescited by 287
- 2023HoloAssist: an Egocentric Human Interaction Dataset for Interactive AI Assistants in the Real Worldcited by 166
- 2023CaptainCook4D: A Dataset for Understanding Errors in Procedural Activitiescited by 51
- 2023IndustReal: A Dataset for Procedure Step Recognition Handling Execution Errors in Egocentric Videos in an Industrial-Like Settingcited by 48
- 2024PREGO: online mistake detection in PRocedural EGOcentric videoscited by 39
- 2024Differentiable Task Graph Learning: Procedural Activity Representation and Online Mistake Detection from Egocentric Videoscited by 26
- 2023Every Mistake Counts in Assemblycited by 18
- 2023Navigating Open Set Scenarios for Skeleton-based Action Recognitioncited by 17
- 2025Modeling Multiple Normal Action Representations for Error Detection in Procedural Taskscited by 12
- 2024TI-PREGO: Chain of Thought and In-Context Learning for Online Mistake Detection in PRocedural EGOcentric Videoscited by 10
- 2026IMPACT: A Dataset for Multi-Granularity Human Procedural Action Understanding in Industrial Assemblycited by 8
7 more
- 2026Plan, Watch, Recover: A Benchmark and Architectures for Proactive Procedural Assistancecited by 7
- 2025Procedural Mistake Detection via Action Effect Modelingcited by 6
- 2025Learning to Recognize Correctly Completed Procedure Steps in Egocentric Assembly Videos through Spatio-Temporal Modelingcited by 3
- 2026MistExit: Learning to Exit for Early Mistake Detection in Procedural Videoscited by 2
- 2026IMPACT-HOI: Supervisory Control for Onset-Anchored Partial HOI Event Constructioncited by 2
- 2026The Unreasonable Effectiveness of VLMs for Zero-shot Procedural Mistake Detectioncited by 2
- 2026GuideMe: Multi-Domain Task Guidance and Intervention in Streaming Videocited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.