Prototype Perturbation for Relaxing Alignment Constraints in Backward-Compatible Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The traditional paradigm to update retrieval models requires re-computing the embeddings of the gallery data, a time-consuming and computationally intensive process known as backfilling. To circumvent backfilling, Backward-Compatible Learning (BCL) has been widely explored, which aims to train a new model compatible with the old one. Many previous works focus on effectively aligning the embeddings of the new model with those of the old one to enhance the backward-compatibility. Nevertheless, such strong alignment constraints would compromise the discriminative ability of the new model, particularly when different classes are closely clustered and hard to distinguish in the old feature space. To address this issue, we propose to relax the constraints by introducing perturbations to the old feature prototypes. This allows us to align the new feature space with a pseudo-old feature space defined by these perturbed prototypes, thereby preserving the discriminative ability of the new model in backward-compatible learning. We have developed two approaches for calculating the perturbations: Neighbor-Driven Prototype Perturbation (NDPP) and Optimization-Driven Prototype Perturbation (ODPP). Particularly, they take into account the feature distributions of not only the old but also the new models to obtain proper perturbations along with new model updating. Extensive experiments on the landmark and commodity datasets demonstrate that our approaches perform favorably against state-of-the-art BCL algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.
Builds on
47 of 65 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
35 more
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 309
- 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 227
- 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 191
- 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 130
- 2024Expandable Subspace Ensemble for Pre-Trained Model-Based Class-Incremental Learningcited by 117
- 2021DSSL: Deep Surroundings-person Separation Learning for Text-based Person Retrievalcited by 102
- 2020Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 75
- 2023Towards Unified Text-based Person Retrieval: A Large-scale Multi-Attribute and Language Search Benchmarkcited by 75
- 2021Extending CLIP for Category-to-image Retrieval in E-commercecited by 24
- 2022Towards Universal Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 21
- 2021Forward Compatible Training for Large-Scale Embedding Retrieval Systemscited by 19
- 2022Continual Learning for Visual Search with Backward Consistent Feature Embeddingcited by 17
- 2021CoReS: Compatible Representations via Stationaritycited by 14
- 2022Dynamic Contrastive Distillation for Image-Text Retrievalcited by 14
- 2023Boundary-aware Backward-Compatible Representation via Adversarial Learning in Image Retrievalcited by 11
- 2021Dual-Tuning: Joint Prototype Transfer and Structure Regularization for Compatible Feature Learningcited by 9
- 2022Privacy-Preserving Model Upgrades with Bidirectional Compatible Training in Image Retrievalcited by 9
- 2021Neighborhood Consensus Contrastive Learning for Backward-Compatible Representationcited by 8
- 2022BT2: Backward-compatible Training with Basis Transformationcited by 8
- 2023Cross-Class Feature Augmentation for Class Incremental Learningcited by 8
- 2024Stationary Representations: Optimally Approximating Compatibility and Implications for Improved Model Replacementscited by 8
- 2023FastFill: Efficient Compatible Model Updatecited by 7
- 2022CL2R: Compatible Lifelong Learning Representationscited by 6
- 2023Metric Compatible Training for Online Backfilling in Large-Scale Retrievalcited by 6
- 20212nd Place Solution to Google Landmark Retrieval 2021cited by 5
- 2022Darwinian Model Upgrades: Model Evolving with Selective Compatibilitycited by 5
- 2024Towards Cross-modal Backward-compatible Representation Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
- 2024Anti-Forgetting Adaptation for Unsupervised Person Re-identificationcited by 5
- 2022Dynamic Gradient Reactivation for Backward Compatible Person Re-identificationcited by 3
- 20213rd Place Solution to Google Landmark Recognition Competition 2021cited by 2
- 2023MixBCT: Towards Self-Adapting Backward-Compatible Trainingcited by 2
- 2024Structure Similarity Preservation Learning for Asymmetric Image Retrievalcited by 2
- 2024Lifelong Person Re-Identification with Backward-Compatibilitycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.