mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CoReS: Compatible Representations via Stationarity

arXiv 2111.07632 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Compatible features enable the direct comparison of old and new learned features allowing to use them interchangeably over time. In visual search systems, this eliminates the need to extract new features from the gallery-set when the representation model is upgraded with novel data. This has a big value in real applications as re-indexing the gallery-set can be computationally expensive when the gallery-set is large, or even infeasible due to privacy or other concerns of the application. In this paper, we propose CoReS, a new training procedure to learn representations that are textitcompatible with those previously learned, grounding on the stationarity of the features as provided by fixed classifiers based on polytopes. With this solution, classes are maximally separated in the representation space and maintain their spatial configuration stationary as new classes are added, so that there is no need to learn any mappings between representations nor to impose pairwise training with the previously learned model. We demonstrate that our training procedure largely outperforms the current state of the art and is particularly effective in the case of multiple upgrades of the training-set, which is the typical case in real applications.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2021.

Builds on

48 of 87 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  5. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  6. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  7. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  8. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
  9. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  10. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 960
  11. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 737
  12. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
36 more
  1. 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 614
  2. 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 478
  3. 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 453
  4. 2020Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classificationcited by 449
  5. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
  6. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 368
  7. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  8. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 309
  9. 2016Large-Margin Softmax Loss for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 296
  10. 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
  11. 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 227
  12. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
  13. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
  14. 2021Exploring Deep Neural Networks via Layer-Peeled Model: Minority Collapse in Imbalanced Trainingcited by 166
  15. 2014Deep Learning Face Representation by Joint Identification-Verificationcited by 162
  16. 2015Particular object retrieval with integral max-pooling of CNN activationscited by 161
  17. 2016Person Re-identification in the Wildcited by 157
  18. 2016Deep Image Retrieval: Learning global representations for image searchcited by 147
  19. 2019ABD-Net: Attentive but Diverse Person Re-Identificationcited by 126
  20. 2016Identity Matters in Deep Learningcited by 109
  21. 2020Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 75
  22. 2018Towards Understanding Learning Representations: To What Extent Do Different Neural Networks Learn the Same Representationcited by 62
  23. 2020Positive-Congruent Training: Towards Regression-Free Model Updatescited by 57
  24. 2018Fix your classifier: the marginal value of training the last weight layercited by 43
  25. 2019Torchreid: A Library for Deep Learning Person Re-Identification in Pytorchcited by 41
  26. 2020An Empirical Analysis of Backward Compatibility in Machine Learning Systemscited by 38
  27. 2021Learning Compatible Embeddingscited by 37
  28. 2019A survey of advances in vision-based vehicle re-identificationcited by 36
  29. 2020Class-incremental Learning with Pre-allocated Fixed Classifierscited by 33
  30. 2020Unified Representation Learning for Cross Model Compatibilitycited by 30
  31. 2020Asymmetric metric learning for knowledge transfercited by 29
  32. 2021Regular Polytope Networkscited by 24
  33. 2021Compatibility-aware Heterogeneous Visual Searchcited by 23
  34. 2021Backward-Compatible Prediction Updates: A Probabilistic Approachcited by 14
  35. 2018Towards Visual Feature Translationcited by 8
  36. 2017Memory Based Online Learning of Deep Representations from Video Streamscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: