mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Darwinian Model Upgrades: Model Evolving with Selective Compatibility

arXiv 2210.06954 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The traditional model upgrading paradigm for retrieval requires recomputing all gallery embeddings before deploying the new model (dubbed as "backfilling"), which is quite expensive and time-consuming considering billions of instances in industrial applications. BCT presents the first step towards backward-compatible model upgrades to get rid of backfilling. It is workable but leaves the new model in a dilemma between new feature discriminativeness and new-to-old compatibility due to the undifferentiated compatibility constraints. In this work, we propose Darwinian Model Upgrades (DMU), which disentangle the inheritance and variation in the model evolving with selective backward compatibility and forward adaptation, respectively. The old-to-new heritable knowledge is measured by old feature discriminativeness, and the gallery features, especially those of poor quality, are evolved in a lightweight manner to become more adaptive in the new latent space. We demonstrate the superiority of DMU through comprehensive experiments on large-scale landmark retrieval and face recognition benchmarks. DMU effectively alleviates the new-to-new degradation and improves new-to-old compatibility, rendering a more proper model upgrading paradigm in large-scale retrieval systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 24 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  3. 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
  4. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 305
  5. 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 189
  6. 2020Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 74
  7. 2020Positive-Congruent Training: Towards Regression-Free Model Updatescited by 55
  8. 2021Learning Compatible Embeddingscited by 37
  9. 2020Unified Representation Learning for Cross Model Compatibilitycited by 30
  10. 2020Asymmetric metric learning for knowledge transfercited by 28
  11. 2021Compatibility-aware Heterogeneous Visual Searchcited by 22
  12. 2022Towards Universal Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 20
9 more
  1. 2021Forward Compatible Training for Large-Scale Embedding Retrieval Systemscited by 19
  2. 2019Large-scale Landmark Retrieval/Recognition under a Noisy and Diverse Datasetcited by 17
  3. 2022Learning Backward Compatible Embeddingscited by 16
  4. 2020Supporting large-scale image recognition with out-of-domain samplescited by 9
  5. 2022Privacy-Preserving Model Upgrades with Bidirectional Compatible Training in Image Retrievalcited by 9
  6. 20201st Place Solution to Google Landmark Retrieval 2020cited by 6
  7. 2022Hot-Refresh Model Upgrades with Regression-Alleviating Compatible Training in Image Retrievalcited by 6
  8. 20203rd Place Solution to "Google Landmark Retrieval 2020"cited by 5
  9. 20212nd Place Solution to Google Landmark Retrieval 2021cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.