mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Metric Compatible Training for Online Backfilling in Large-Scale Retrieval

arXiv 2301.03767 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2023cs.CV cs.IR cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Backfilling is the process of re-extracting all gallery embeddings from upgraded models in image retrieval systems. It inevitably requires a prohibitively large amount of computational cost and even entails the downtime of the service. Although backward-compatible learning sidesteps this challenge by tackling query-side representations, this leads to suboptimal solutions in principle because gallery embeddings cannot benefit from model upgrades. We address this dilemma by introducing an online backfilling algorithm, which enables us to achieve a progressive performance improvement during the backfilling process while not sacrificing the final performance of new model after the completion of backfilling. To this end, we first propose a simple distance rank merge technique for online backfilling. Then, we incorporate a reverse transformation module for more effective and efficient merging, which is further enhanced by adopting a metric-compatible contrastive learning approach. These two components help to make the distances of old and new models compatible, resulting in desirable merge results during backfilling with no extra computational overhead. Extensive experiments show the effectiveness of our framework on four standard benchmarks in various settings.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2023.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  6. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  9. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 309
  10. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
  11. 2014Deep Learning Face Representation by Joint Identification-Verificationcited by 162
  12. 2016Deep Image Retrieval: Learning global representations for image searchcited by 147
11 more
  1. 2020Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 75
  2. 2018The Devil of Face Recognition is in the Noisecited by 65
  3. 2018Towards Understanding Learning Representations: To What Extent Do Different Neural Networks Learn the Same Representationcited by 62
  4. 2021Learning Compatible Embeddingscited by 37
  5. 2021Compatibility-aware Heterogeneous Visual Searchcited by 23
  6. 2022Towards Universal Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 21
  7. 2021Forward Compatible Training for Large-Scale Embedding Retrieval Systemscited by 19
  8. 2022Continual Learning for Visual Search with Backward Consistent Feature Embeddingcited by 17
  9. 2021Dual-Tuning: Joint Prototype Transfer and Structure Regularization for Compatible Feature Learningcited by 9
  10. 2022Privacy-Preserving Model Upgrades with Bidirectional Compatible Training in Image Retrievalcited by 9
  11. 2022Dynamic Gradient Reactivation for Backward Compatible Person Re-identificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.