mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PhyLatent: Learning Dynamics-Relevant Representations for JEPA World Models

arXiv 2608.05720 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 6

On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose PhyLatent, a dynamics-relevant training objective for Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) world models. Our key observation is that preventing global latent collapse does not necessarily ensure that the learned representation preserves physically meaningful state and action relationships. We identify three failure modes: sensitivity to appearance changes that leave the physical state unchanged, insufficient separation of distinct physical states, and insufficient separation of different action-conditioned futures. We refer to these as Physical Invariance Collapse, Physical Distinguishability Collapse, and Counterfactual Dynamics Collapse, respectively. PhyLatent targets these failures through three coordinated training pathways, implemented with static visual invariance, physical state grounding, future representation alignment, counterfactual branch separation, and latent denoising. On OGBench-Cube, PhyLatent reduces the three collapse rates by 43.9%, 27.9%, and 47.1%, respectively, while improving model predictive control (MPC) success by 12.0 percentage points (17.2% relative). Across four visual-control tasks, average planning success increases by 6.62 percentage points (8.3% relative). These results show that global non-collapse alone is insufficient for learning a reliable JEPA world-model state space, and that explicitly preserving dynamics-relevant structure can improve closed-loop planning.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

Builds on

34 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026QQWorld: Quantile-Quantile Matching for World Model Regularization30 Jul
  2. 2026Sensorimotor World Models: Perception for Action via Inverse Dynamics18 Jun
  3. 2026Subspace-Decomposed JEPAs: Disentangling Progression and Content in Latent World Models29 May
  4. 2026Sub-JEPA: Subspace Gaussian Regularization for Stable End-to-End World Models10 May
  5. 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels13 Mar
  6. 2024DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning7 Nov
  7. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video15 Feb
  8. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture19 Jan
  9. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels12 Nov

Other references · 25

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  7. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  8. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  9. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
  10. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
  11. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  12. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
13 more
  1. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
  2. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  3. 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
  4. 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 512
  5. 2017Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from Videocited by 459
  6. 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 436
  7. 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 375
  8. 2025LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristicscited by 254
  9. 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 238
  10. 2019DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learningcited by 207
  11. 2025Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Modelscited by 89
  12. 2022Denoised MDPs: Learning World Models Better Than the World Itselfcited by 68
  13. 2026stable-worldmodel: A Platform for Reproducible World Modeling Research and Evaluationcited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Toward Physically Grounded JEPA World Models for Goal-Conditioned Robotic Planning
  2. 2026Hamiltonian JEPA: Action-Conditioned World Models with an Inherited Control State
  3. 2026Preserving Unstable Modes Through Inverse Dynamics in JEPA World Models
  4. 2026Spectral-Target Physical Latent Structuring for JEPA-Style World Models
  5. 2026AVL-JEPA: Preventing Causal Dynamics Information Collapse In Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture World Models
  6. 2026Qantara: Bridge-Flow Training for Multi-Paradigm JEPA Control
  7. 2026Diagnosing JEPA World Models with Action-Conditioned Predictive Consistency
  8. 2026LRC-JEPA: Disentangling Dynamics and Residual Context for Efficient World Models