No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Models
On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models
Abstract (arXiv)
Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) learn world models by predicting future embeddings, but the objective admits a trivial solution of a constant encoder, so every practical system adds an anti-collapse mechanism (LeCun, 2022; Assran et al., 2023; Bardes et al., 2022; 2024). LeWorldModel (LeWM) prevents collapse with SIGReg, a regularizer that forces the latent distribution to match an isotropic Gaussian: the representation is stabilized by prescribing what it must look like, independently of the environment it models. We argue that the anti-collapse pressure can instead come from the transition data itself. Action-Contrastive Masked Transition Modeling (AC-MTM) keeps LeWM's forward latent-prediction objective and adds a training-only inverse-dynamics head trained with Action-NCE: each latent transition must identify the action that produced it among the other actions in the batch, a discrimination task that a collapsed encoder provably fails. The inverse branch is discarded after training, leaving test-time encoding, forward prediction, planning, and compute identical to LeWM. On four standard pixel-control tasks under a matched planning protocol, AC-MTM trains stably from scratch and matches SIGReg on average. On the harder multi-object OGBench Visual Scene task, results are consistent with the prescribed geometry becoming a bottleneck: AC-MTM reaches 80.0±2.0% success versus 58.0±2.0% for SIGReg, improving by 20-24 points in each training seed. A single 50-episode random-policy run gives a 52% baseline estimate. Contrastive inverse dynamics thus provides a distribution-free anti-collapse signal that requires no target network, stop-gradient, pretrained encoder, or reconstruction objective, and we characterize the action-space and observability assumptions under which it holds. We make our code available at https://github.com/jackboyla/action-contrastive-jepa
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.
Builds on
19 of 24 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Sensorimotor World Models: Perception for Action via Inverse Dynamics18 Jun
- 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels13 Mar
- 2024DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning7 Nov
- 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video15 Feb
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture19 Jan
Other references · 14
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 785
- 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 512
- 2025LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristicscited by 254
- 2016Learning to Poke by Poking: Experiential Learning of Intuitive Physicscited by 154
- 2025Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Modelscited by 89
- 2016Loss is its own Reward: Self-Supervision for Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
- 2023TACO: Temporal Latent Action-Driven Contrastive Loss for Visual Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Algebraic Consistency Alone Does Not Certify Temporal Structure in Latent Action Modelscited by 0
- 2026Representation World Model: Learning States, Transition and Executable Plans in Representationcited by 0
- 2026SLIP-VLA: Single-Step Latent Imagination for Policy Learning in Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 0
- 2026CF-JEPA: Improving Robustness of JEPA World Models via Controllability Factorizationcited by 0
- 2026Keeping JEPA World Models Plannable When Little of the Frame Movescited by 0
- 2026Keeping JEPA World Models Plannable When Little of the Frame Moves2 Oct 2026
- 2026CF-JEPA: Improving Robustness of JEPA World Models via Controllability Factorization30 Sep 2026
- 2026SLIP-VLA: Single-Step Latent Imagination for Policy Learning in Vision-Language-Action Models27 Sep 2026
- 2026Representation World Model: Learning States, Transition and Executable Plans in Representation24 Sep 2026
- 2026Algebraic Consistency Alone Does Not Certify Temporal Structure in Latent Action Models20 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Hamiltonian JEPA: Action-Conditioned World Models with an Inherited Control State
- 2026Diagnosing JEPA World Models with Action-Conditioned Predictive Consistency
- 2026JEPA-x: Cross-Predictive Physics Grounding for Forecastable Latent Dynamics
- 2026I Act Therefore I Am: When Is JEPA's Action-Conditioning Enough to Learn Causal Mechanisms?
- 2026Preserving Unstable Modes Through Inverse Dynamics in JEPA World Models
- 2026UWM-JEPA: Predictive World Models That Imagine in Belief Space
- 2026LeWAM: End-to-End World and Action Modeling with JEPAs
- 2026On the Identifiability of Controlled World Models