mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Why and How Auxiliary Tasks Improve JEPA Representations

arXiv 2509.12249 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) is increasingly used for visual representation learning and as a component in model-based RL, but its behavior remains poorly understood. We provide a theoretical characterization of a simple, practical JEPA variant that has an auxiliary regression head trained jointly with latent dynamics. We prove a No Unhealthy Representation Collapse theorem: in deterministic MDPs, if training drives both the latent-transition consistency loss and the auxiliary regression loss to zero, then any pair of non-equivalent observations, i.e., those that do not have the same transition dynamics or auxiliary value, must map to distinct latent representations. Thus, the auxiliary task anchors which distinctions the representation must preserve. Controlled ablations in a counting environment corroborate the theory and show that training the JEPA model jointly with the auxiliary head generates a richer representation than training them separately. Our work indicates a path to improve JEPA encoders: training them with an auxiliary function that, together with the transition dynamics, encodes the right equivalence relations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.

Builds on

24 of 32 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  3. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
  4. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  5. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  6. 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 512
  7. 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 436
  8. 2022Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Controlcited by 397
  9. 2024DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planningcited by 386
  10. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  11. 2019DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learningcited by 207
  12. 2022RankMe: Assessing the downstream performance of pretrained self-supervised representations by their rankcited by 153
12 more
  1. 2022Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning Recover Global and Local Spectral Embedding Methodscited by 149
  2. 2020Sample-efficient Cross-Entropy Method for Real-time Planningcited by 95
  3. 2022Neural Collapse: A Review on Modelling Principles and Generalizationcited by 95
  4. 2025Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Modelscited by 89
  5. 2023The SSL Interplay: Augmentations, Inductive Bias, and Generalizationcited by 40
  6. 2025Joint Embedding vs Reconstruction: Provable Benefits of Latent Space Prediction for Self Supervised Learningcited by 36
  7. 2023The Tunnel Effect: Building Data Representations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 34
  8. 2023LiDAR: Sensing Linear Probing Performance in Joint Embedding SSL Architecturescited by 27
  9. 2024Video Representation Learning with Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturescited by 15
  10. 2025JEPA for RL: Investigating Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures for Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  11. 2020A Number Sense as an Emergent Property of the Manipulating Braincited by 3
  12. 2020Relating Apartness and Bisimulationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.