mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward Physically Grounded JEPA World Models for Goal-Conditioned Robotic Planning

arXiv 2609.03565 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models

Abstract (arXiv)

Action-conditioned JEPA world models enable planning toward visually specified goals without reconstructing future pixels, yet latent prediction alone does not explicitly encourage the learned representations to retain information relevant to robotic control. We introduce an end-to-end JEPA world model that augments latent prediction with inverse dynamics (IDM) and state alignment (SA). While inverse dynamics discourages latent collapse and makes latent transitions informative of the actions that produced them, state alignment grounds consecutive representations in their associated physical configuration and motion. Across four benchmark tasks, our model attains the highest success rates on TwoRoom (100%), PushT (98%), and OGBench-Cube (87%), while performing comparably to LeWorldModel on Reacher. Our ablation further shows that adding state alignment consistently improves planning success over IDM alone across all four tasks. Although LeWorldModel, our primary baseline, attains higher average straightening on OGBench-Cube, transition-subspace analysis shows that its transition energy is concentrated in a substantially lower-dimensional subspace. Our state-aligned model exhibits a higher effective transition dimension than LeWorldModel and improves planning over IDM alone, supporting state alignment as an effective complement to inverse dynamics for robotic planning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 11 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 16 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Delta-JEPA: Learning Action-Sensitive World Models via Latent Difference Decoding30 Jun
  2. 2026Sensorimotor World Models: Perception for Action via Inverse Dynamics18 Jun
  3. 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels13 Mar
  4. 2026Temporal Straightening for Latent Planning12 Mar
  5. 2024DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning7 Nov
  6. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels12 Nov

Other references · 5

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  2. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  3. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  4. 2025LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristicscited by 227
  5. 2025Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Modelscited by 77

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Is Forward Prediction Enough? Physical State Grounding for JEPA World Models
  2. 2026Hamiltonian JEPA: Action-Conditioned World Models with an Inherited Control State
  3. 2026H-JEPA: End-to-End Learning of Hierarchical World Models for Visual Planning
  4. 2026JEPA-x: Cross-Predictive Physics Grounding for Forecastable Latent Dynamics
  5. 2026LRC-JEPA: Disentangling Dynamics and Residual Context for Efficient World Models
  6. 2026D-JEPA: A Decision-Aligned Latent World Model
  7. 2026The Planning Limits of Latent World Models
  8. 2026Temporal-Distance JEPA: Plan-Aware Representation Learning for Latent World Model Predictive Control