mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LpWM: A Case for Sparse Representations in World Models

arXiv 2608.22764 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models

Abstract (arXiv)

Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) learn latent dynamics for planning and avoid representation collapse by matching features to maximum-entropy distributions such as isotropic Gaussians, yielding dense representations. However, it is unclear whether dense representations are the most favorable geometry for modeling dynamics. In this work, we ask whether a different geometry, sparse representations, can make action-conditioned latent dynamics easier to model, and what dynamical structure emerges from such representations. We first show that nonlinear Lipschitz dynamics can be approximated arbitrarily well by action-conditioned linear dynamics in a sufficiently high-dimensional one-hot latent space, with rollout error vanishing as the dimension grows. This motivates distributed sparse representations as a practical relaxation of one-hot sparsity. We introduce LpWorldModel (LpWM), a JEPA model regularized with Rectified Distribution Matching Regularization (RDMReg) to match encoder features to a Rectified Generalized Gaussian distribution, yielding non-negative sparse codes. Empirically, sparsity lowers the predictor complexity required for successful planning: on PushT, sparse LpWM outperforms dense LeWM by up to 57% in planning success at intermediate predictor capacities. This advantage also extends beyond Gaussian distribution matching, with LpWM outperforming dense VICReg representations across multiple predictor families. We further find that the learned sparse representations are mode-factored, with support encoding discrete dynamical regimes and feature magnitudes capturing continuous within-regime state. Together, these results suggest that sparse representations can reduce the predictor complexity required for control while revealing interpretable structure.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 29 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

29 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026SCALE: State-Calibrated Latent Embeddings for JEPA Planning in the Right Geometry17 Aug
  2. 2026AdaJEPA: An Adaptive Latent World Model30 Jun
  3. 2026Hierarchical Planning with Latent World Models3 Apr
  4. 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels13 Mar
  5. 2026A Lightweight Library for Energy-Based Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures3 Feb
  6. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video15 Feb
  7. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture19 Jan
  8. 2022Learning Robust Dynamics through Variational Sparse Gating21 Oct

Other references · 21

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  6. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  7. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
  8. 2020Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 279
  9. 2025LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristicscited by 254
  10. 2016Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive controlcited by 140
  11. 2014Dynamic mode decomposition with controlcited by 129
  12. 2018State Representation Learning for Control: An Overviewcited by 127
9 more
  1. 2023A Spectral Condition for Feature Learningcited by 109
  2. 2025Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Modelscited by 89
  3. 2023Learning Efficient Coding of Natural Images with Maximum Manifold Capacity Representationscited by 31
  4. 2026stable-worldmodel: A Platform for Reproducible World Modeling Research and Evaluationcited by 20
  5. 2026Rectified LpJEPA: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures with Sparse and Maximum-Entropy Representationscited by 10
  6. 2024Improving Pre-trained Self-Supervised Embeddings Through Effective Entropy Maximizationcited by 6
  7. 2026Radial-VCReg: More Informative Representation Learning Through Radial Gaussianizationcited by 4
  8. 2026On the Existence of Koopman Linear Embeddings for Controlled Nonlinear Systemscited by 3
  9. 2023Data-Driven Deep Learning Based Feedback Linearization of Systems with Unknown Dynamicscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Models
  2. 2026Spectral-Target Physical Latent Structuring for JEPA-Style World Models
  3. 2026Identifiable World Models from Pretrained Diffusion Representations
  4. 2026Geometric Priors for Generalizable World Models via Vector Symbolic Architecture
  5. 2026Discrete World Models via Regularization
  6. 2026Delta-JEPA: Learning Action-Sensitive World Models via Latent Difference Decoding
  7. 2026Beyond the Next Step: Variable-Length Latent World Models for Long-Horizon Planning
  8. 2026Enhancing Latent World Models with Associative Memory