mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fine-Grained Reward Optimization for Machine Translation using Error Severity Mappings

arXiv 2411.05986 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has been proven to be an effective and robust method for training neural machine translation systems, especially when paired with powerful reward models that accurately assess translation quality. However, most research has focused on RL methods that use sentence-level feedback, leading to inefficient learning signals due to the reward sparsity problem -- the model receives a single score for the entire sentence. To address this, we propose a novel approach that leverages fine-grained, token-level quality assessments along with error severity levels using RL methods. Specifically, we use xCOMET, a state-of-the-art quality estimation system, as our token-level reward model. We conduct experiments on small and large translation datasets with standard encoder-decoder and large language models-based machine translation systems, comparing the impact of sentence-level versus fine-grained reward signals on translation quality. Our results show that training with token-level rewards improves translation quality across language pairs over baselines according to both automatic and human evaluation. Furthermore, token-level reward optimization improves training stability, evidenced by a steady increase in mean rewards over training epochs.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 53 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2024.

Builds on

53 of 93 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translation10 Oct
  2. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  3. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  4. 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Model23 Jan
  5. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
  6. 2023Aligning Neural Machine Translation Models: Human Feedback in Training and Inference15 Nov
  7. 2023Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment7 Nov
  8. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
  9. 2017Reinforcement Learning for Bandit Neural Machine Translation with Simulated Human Feedback24 Jul

Other references · 44

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  6. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  7. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
  8. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  9. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  10. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  11. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
  12. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
32 more
  1. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  2. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
  3. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  4. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
  5. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  6. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  7. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
  8. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 280
  9. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  10. 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 206
  11. 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 159
  12. 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 127
  13. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 115
  14. 2019Using Natural Language for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  15. 2023The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 95
  16. 2023A Paradigm Shift in Machine Translation: Boosting Translation Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 89
  17. 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
  18. 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 87
  19. 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 78
  20. 2018A Study of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 74
  21. 2018Can Neural Machine Translation be Improved with User Feedback?cited by 72
  22. 2018Reliability and Learnability of Human Bandit Feedback for Sequence-to-Sequence Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
  23. 2024TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 43
  24. 2021Revisiting the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
  25. 2017Bandit Structured Prediction for Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 31
  26. 2022Toward Human-Like Evaluation for Natural Language Generation with Error Analysiscited by 18
  27. 2024Reinforcement Learning with Token-level Feedback for Controllable Text Generationcited by 16
  28. 2024Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Datacited by 12
  29. 2020Correct Me If You Can: Learning from Error Corrections and Markingscited by 11
  30. 2024A Preference-driven Paradigm for Enhanced Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 9
  31. 2024Token-level Proximal Policy Optimization for Query Generationcited by 7
  32. 2018Learning from Chunk-based Feedback in Neural Machine Translationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Advancing Translation Preference Modeling with RLHF: A Step Towards Cost-Effective Solution
  2. 2025SSR-Zero: Simple Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for Machine Translation
  3. 2026PEGRL: Improving Machine Translation by Post-Editing Guided Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Rewrite to Translate, Translate to Reward: Reinforcement Learning for Source Rewriting in Machine Translation
  5. 2025MT-R1-Zero: Advancing LLM-based Machine Translation via R1-Zero-like Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2024QE-EBM: Using Quality Estimators as Energy Loss for Machine Translation
  7. 2024Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation
  8. 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation