Correct Me If You Can: Learning from Error Corrections and Markings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sequence-to-sequence learning involves a trade-off between signal strength and annotation cost of training data. For example, machine translation data range from costly expert-generated translations that enable supervised learning, to weak quality-judgment feedback that facilitate reinforcement learning. We present the first user study on annotation cost and machine learnability for the less popular annotation mode of error markings. We show that error markings for translations of TED talks from English to German allow precise credit assignment while requiring significantly less human effort than correcting/post-editing, and that error-marked data can be used successfully to fine-tune neural machine translation models.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2024Error Span Annotation: A Balanced Approach for Human Evaluation of Machine Translationcited by 62
- 2023Consistency is Key: Disentangling Label Variation in Natural Language Processing with Intra-Annotator Agreementcited by 22
- 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generationcited by 12
- 2024Fine-Grained Reward Optimization for Machine Translation using Error Severity Mappingscited by 11
- 2025MT-RewardTree: A Comprehensive Framework for Advancing LLM-Based Machine Translation via Reward Modelingcited by 9
- 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2021How to Evaluate a Summarizer: Study Design and Statistical Analysis for Manual Linguistic Quality Evaluationcited by 7
- 2021Could AI Democratise Education? Socio-Technical Imaginaries of an EdTech Revolutioncited by 6
- 2023Enhancing Supervised Learning with Contrastive Markings in Neural Machine Translation Trainingcited by 3
- 2024Prompting Large Language Models with Human Error Markings for Self-Correcting Machine Translationcited by 3
- 2026LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 3
- 2026LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for Machine Translation20 Apr 2026
- 2025MT-RewardTree: A Comprehensive Framework for Advancing LLM-Based Machine Translation via Reward Modeling15 Mar 2025
- 2024Fine-Grained Reward Optimization for Machine Translation using Error Severity Mappings8 Nov 2024
- 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translation10 Oct 2024
- 2024Error Span Annotation: A Balanced Approach for Human Evaluation of Machine Translation17 Jun 2024
- 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation12 Jun 2024
- 2024Prompting Large Language Models with Human Error Markings for Self-Correcting Machine Translation4 Jun 2024
- 2023Enhancing Supervised Learning with Contrastive Markings in Neural Machine Translation Training17 Jul 2023
- 2023Consistency is Key: Disentangling Label Variation in Natural Language Processing with Intra-Annotator Agreement25 Jan 2023
- 2021Could AI Democratise Education? Socio-Technical Imaginaries of an EdTech Revolution3 Dec 2021
- 2021How to Evaluate a Summarizer: Study Design and Statistical Analysis for Manual Linguistic Quality Evaluation27 Jan 2021