mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MT-RewardTree: A Comprehensive Framework for Advancing LLM-Based Machine Translation via Reward Modeling

arXiv 2503.12123 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 10

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Process reward models (PRMs) have shown success in complex reasoning tasks for large language models (LLMs). However, their application to machine translation (MT) remains underexplored due to the lack of systematic methodologies and evaluation benchmarks. To address this gap, we introduce MT-RewardTree, a comprehensive framework for constructing, evaluating, and deploying process reward models in MT. Unlike traditional vanilla preference pair construction, we propose a novel method for automatically generating token-level preference pairs using approximate Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), which mitigates the prohibitive cost of human annotation for fine-grained steps. Then, we establish the first MT-specific reward model benchmark and provide a systematic comparison of different reward modeling architectures, revealing that token-level supervision effectively captures fine-grained preferences. Experimental results demonstrate that our MT-PRM-Qwen-2.5-3B achieves state-of-the-art performance in both token-level and sequence-level evaluation given the same input prefix. Furthermore, we showcase practical applications where PRMs enable test-time alignment for LLMs without additional alignment training and significantly improve performance in hypothesis ensembling. Our work provides valuable insights into the role of reward models in MT research. Our code and data are released in hrefhttps://sabijun.github.io/MTRewardTreePage/https://sabijun.github.io/MTRewardTreePage.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 36 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.

Builds on

36 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
  2. 2024Offline Reinforcement Learning for LLM Multi-Step Reasoning20 Dec
  3. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning9 Dec
  4. 2024Free Process Rewards without Process Labels2 Dec
  5. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision5 Jun
  6. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  9. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 27

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  4. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  6. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 394
  7. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  8. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 313
  9. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  10. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
  11. 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Stylecited by 176
  12. 2024Marco-o1: Towards Open Reasoning Models for Open-Ended Solutionscited by 144
15 more
  1. 2024Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solverscited by 138
  2. 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFcited by 127
  3. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 115
  4. 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 78
  5. 2024PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Timecited by 60
  6. 2024Scaling of Search and Learning: A Roadmap to Reproduce o1 from Reinforcement Learning Perspectivecited by 50
  7. 2024RLHF Can Speak Many Languages: Unlocking Multilingual Preference Optimization for LLMscited by 43
  8. 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Modelcited by 33
  9. 2024MT-Ranker: Reference-free machine translation evaluation by inter-system rankingcited by 14
  10. 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generationcited by 12
  11. 2024Ladder: A Model-Agnostic Framework Boosting LLM-based Machine Translation to the Next Levelcited by 12
  12. 2020Correct Me If You Can: Learning from Error Corrections and Markingscited by 11
  13. 2024Fine-Grained Reward Optimization for Machine Translation using Error Severity Mappingscited by 11
  14. 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translationcited by 8
  15. 2018Learning from Chunk-based Feedback in Neural Machine Translationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual Settings
  2. 2025ToolRM: Outcome Reward Models for Tool-Calling Large Language Models
  3. 2026PARM: Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model
  4. 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models
  5. 2025From Outcomes to Processes: Guiding PRM Learning from ORM for Inference-Time Alignment
  6. 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignment
  7. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
  8. 2025Sentence-level Reward Model can Generalize Better for Aligning LLM from Human Preference