Learning-Augmented Robust Algorithmic Recourse
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic recourse provides individuals who receive undesirable outcomes from machine learning systems with minimum-cost improvements to achieve a desirable outcome. However, machine learning models often get updated, so the recourse may not lead to the desired outcome. The robust recourse framework chooses recourses that are less sensitive to adversarial model changes, but this comes at a higher cost. To address this, we initiate the study of learning-augmented algorithmic recourse and evaluate the extent to which a designer equipped with a prediction of the future model can reduce the cost of recourse when the prediction is accurate (consistency) while also limiting the cost even when the prediction is inaccurate (robustness). We propose a novel algorithm, study the robustness-consistency trade-off, and analyze how prediction accuracy affects performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
62 of 90 references.
References · 62
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
38 more
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
- 2020Performative Predictioncited by 318
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
- 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
- 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 194
- 2017The Case for Learned Index Structurescited by 188
- 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 162
- 2020Algorithms with Predictionscited by 152
- 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
- 2020Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachcited by 139
- 2019Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systemscited by 128
- 2021On the Convergence and Robustness of Adversarial Trainingcited by 127
- 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
- 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
- 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
- 2022Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Treescited by 80
- 2024Improving Online Algorithms via ML Predictionscited by 65
- 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
- 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recoursecited by 56
- 2021Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysiscited by 52
- 2019Equalizing Recourse across Groupscited by 51
- 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
- 2019On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learningcited by 48
- 2021Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learningcited by 48
- 2021Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanationscited by 47
- 2023Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 45
- 2022Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 40
- 2021Consistent Counterfactuals for Deep Modelscited by 37
- 2024Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 29
- 2020Efficient Training of Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 24
- 2022On the Trade-Off between Actionable Explanations and the Right to be Forgottencited by 20
- 2022Learning-Augmented Mechanism Design: Leveraging Predictions for Facility Locationcited by 19
- 2022Robust Bayesian Recoursecited by 18
- 2023Promoting Counterfactual Robustness through Diversitycited by 17
- 2023Recourse under Model Multiplicity via Argumentative Ensembling (Technical Report)cited by 15
- 2019On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimizationcited by 14
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Optimal Robust Recourse with Lp-Bounded Model Changecited by 3
- 2026The Role of Causality in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 1
- 2026RecourseBench: A Modular Framework for Reproducible Algorithmic Recourse Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Algorithmic Recourse Under Competitioncited by 0
- 2026Algorithmic Recourse Under Competition30 Sep 2026
- 2026The Role of Causality in Algorithmic Recourse30 Jul 2026
- 2026RecourseBench: A Modular Framework for Reproducible Algorithmic Recourse Evaluation15 Jun 2026
- 2025Optimal Robust Recourse with Lp-Bounded Model Change25 Sep 2025