mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection

arXiv 2408.04284 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2024cs.CLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ease of access to large language models (LLMs) has enabled a widespread of machine-generated texts, and now it is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated. This raises concerns about potential misuse, particularly within educational and academic domains. Thus, it is important to develop practical systems that can automate the process. Here, we present one such system, LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection. Unlike most previous work on machine-generated text detection, which focused on binary classification, LLM-DetectAIve supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished. Category (iii) aims to detect attempts to obfuscate the fact that a text was machine-generated, while category (iv) looks for cases where the LLM was used to polish a human-written text, which is typically acceptable in academic writing, but not in education. Our experiments show that LLM-DetectAIve can effectively identify the above four categories, which makes it a potentially useful tool in education, academia, and other domains. LLM-DetectAIve is publicly accessible at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/LLM-DetectAIve. The video describing our system is available at https://youtu.be/E8eT_bE7k8c.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2024.

Builds on

13 of 21 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  3. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  4. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  5. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  6. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 126
  7. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
  8. 2022ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?cited by 88
  9. 2023OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examplescited by 80
  10. 2024LLM-as-a-Coauthor: Can Mixed Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text Be Detected?cited by 47
  11. 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  12. 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
1 more
  1. 2024Authorship Obfuscation in Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 19; 2026: 3.

25 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Beemo: Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputscited by 26
  2. 2025EditLens: Quantifying the Extent of AI Editing in Textcited by 26
  3. 2025Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLMcited by 12
  4. 2025DETree: DEtecting Human-AI Collaborative Texts via Tree-Structured Hierarchical Representation Learningcited by 12
  5. 2025GenAI Content Detection Task 1: English and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection: AI vs. Humancited by 11
  6. 2025CoDet-M4: Detecting Machine-Generated Code in Multi-Lingual, Multi-Generator and Multi-Domain Settingscited by 11
  7. 2024On the Generalization and Adaptation Ability of Machine-Generated Text Detectors in Academic Writingcited by 10
  8. 2025Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectorscited by 9
  9. 2025Frankentext: Stitching random text fragments into long-form narrativescited by 8
  10. 2025DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and Modelscited by 8
  11. 2025Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Reviewcited by 6
  12. 2025Decoupling Content and Expression: Two-Dimensional Detection of AI-Generated Textcited by 6
13 more
  1. 2025Real, Fake, or Manipulated? Detecting Machine-Influenced Textcited by 6
  2. 2025FDLLM: A Dedicated Detector for Black-Box LLMs Fingerprintingcited by 4
  3. 2025How Sampling Affects the Detectability of Machine-written texts: A Comprehensive Studycited by 4
  4. 2024MOSAIC: Multiple Observers Spotting AI Contentcited by 3
  5. 2025Robust and Fine-Grained Detection of AI Generated Textscited by 3
  6. 2025Beyond Easy Wins: A Text Hardness-Aware Benchmark for LLM-generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  7. 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?cited by 3
  8. 2025A Comprehensive Dataset for Human vs. AI Generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  9. 2025Domain Gating Ensemble Networks for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
  10. 2025AINL-Eval 2025 Shared Task: Detection of AI-Generated Scientific Abstracts in Russiancited by 0
  11. 2026Build it, Break it, Repeat: Benchmarking and improving LLM-manipulated disinformation detection in social media postscited by 0
  12. 2026Detecting GPT-Assisted Writing Using Interpretable Stylometric Featurescited by 0
  13. 2026How Much Were You Told? Measuring External Information in Peer Reviewscited by 0