Beyond Easy Wins: A Text Hardness-Aware Benchmark for LLM-generated Text Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel evaluation paradigm for AI text detectors that prioritizes real-world and equitable assessment. Current approaches predominantly report conventional metrics like AUROC, overlooking that even modest false positive rates constitute a critical impediment to practical deployment of detection systems. Furthermore, real-world deployment necessitates predetermined threshold configuration, making detector stability (i.e. the maintenance of consistent performance across diverse domains and adversarial scenarios), a critical factor. These aspects have been largely ignored in previous research and benchmarks. Our benchmark, SHIELD, addresses these limitations by integrating both reliability and stability factors into a unified evaluation metric designed for practical assessment. Furthermore, we develop a post-hoc, model-agnostic humanification framework that modifies AI text to more closely resemble human authorship, incorporating a controllable hardness parameter. This hardness-aware approach effectively challenges current SOTA zero-shot detection methods in maintaining both reliability and stability. (Data and code: https://github.com/navid-aub/SHIELD-Benchmark)
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.
Builds on
33 of 50 references.
References · 33
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 575
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
21 more
- 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 131
- 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 129
- 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
- 2019On the Use of ArXiv as a Datasetcited by 103
- 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
- 2021Is GPT-3 Text Indistinguishable from Human Text? Scarecrow: A Framework for Scrutinizing Machine Textcited by 89
- 2023Element-aware Summarization with Large Language Models: Expert-aligned Evaluation and Chain-of-Thought Methodcited by 76
- 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
- 2024No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choicescited by 50
- 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
- 2024Humanizing Machine-Generated Content: Evading AI-Text Detection through Adversarial Attackcited by 27
- 2024LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 25
- 2024Adaptive Ensembles of Fine-Tuned Transformers for LLM-Generated Text Detectioncited by 22
- 2023DPIC: Decoupling Prompt and Intrinsic Characteristics for LLM Generated Text Detectioncited by 18
- 2024Can Watermarking Large Language Models Prevent Copyrighted Text Generation and Hide Training Data?cited by 18
- 2024Robust AI-Generated Text Detection by Restricted Embeddingscited by 18
- 2024Are AI-Generated Text Detectors Robust to Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 16
- 2024Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text using Token Cohesivenesscited by 13
- 2023Shilling Black-box Review-based Recommender Systems through Fake Review Generationcited by 8
- 2024ESPERANTO: Evaluating Synthesized Phrases to Enhance Robustness in AI Detection for Text Originationcited by 6
- 2024NELA-PS: A Dataset of Pink Slime News Articles for the Study of Local News Ecosystemscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025LLMTrace: A Corpus for Classification and Fine-Grained Localization of AI-Written Textcited by 2
- 2026ARB: A Matched Authorship-Rewriting Benchmark Dataset for AI-Text Detector Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026AEyeDE: An Attention-Based Attribution Framework for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Measuring Artifact Reliance in Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 0
- 2026Measuring Artifact Reliance in Machine-Generated Text Detectors9 Oct 2026
- 2026ARB: A Matched Authorship-Rewriting Benchmark Dataset for AI-Text Detector Evaluation31 Jul 2026
- 2026AEyeDE: An Attention-Based Attribution Framework for AI-Generated Text Detection13 Apr 2026
- 2025LLMTrace: A Corpus for Classification and Fine-Grained Localization of AI-Written Text25 Sep 2025