mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FDLLM: A Dedicated Detector for Black-Box LLMs Fingerprinting

arXiv 2501.16029 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming the landscape of digital content creation. However, the prevalent black-box Application Programming Interface (API) access to many LLMs introduces significant challenges in accountability, governance, and security. LLM fingerprinting, which aims to identify the source model by analyzing statistical and stylistic features of generated text, offers a potential solution. Current progress in this area is hindered by a lack of dedicated datasets and the need for efficient, practical methods that are robust against adversarial manipulations. To address these challenges, we introduce FD-Dataset, a comprehensive bilingual fingerprinting benchmark comprising 90,000 text samples from 20 famous proprietary and open-source LLMs. Furthermore, we present FDLLM, a novel fingerprinting method that leverages parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to fine-tune a foundation model. This approach enables LoRA to extract deep, persistent features that characterize each source LLM. Through our analysis, we find that LoRA adaptation promotes the aggregation of outputs from the same LLM in representation space while enhancing the separation between different LLMs. This mechanism explains why LoRA proves particularly effective for LLM fingerprinting. Extensive empirical evaluations on FD-Dataset demonstrate FDLLM's superiority, achieving a Macro F1 score 22.1% higher than the strongest baseline. FDLLM also exhibits strong generalization to newly released models, achieving an average accuracy of 95% on unseen models. Notably, FDLLM remains consistently robust under various adversarial attacks, including polishing, translation, and synonym substitution. Experimental results show that FDLLM reduces the average attack success rate from 49.2% (LM-D) to 23.9%.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2025.

Builds on

44 of 82 references.

References · 44

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  6. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  7. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  8. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  9. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
  10. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
  11. 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 706
  12. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
32 more
  1. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 675
  2. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
  3. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  4. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  5. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  6. 2024InternLM2 Technical Reportcited by 391
  7. 2024LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 365
  8. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  9. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  10. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  11. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
  12. 2025Qwen2.5-1M Technical Reportcited by 158
  13. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
  14. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  15. 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 90
  16. 2023Use of LLMs for Illicit Purposes: Threats, Prevention Measures, and Vulnerabilitiescited by 76
  17. 2024LLMmap: Fingerprinting For Large Language Modelscited by 56
  18. 2023Large Language Models can be Guided to Evade AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  19. 2022Attribution and Obfuscation of Neural Text Authorship: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 40
  20. 2023HuRef: HUman-REadable Fingerprint for Large Language Modelscited by 32
  21. 2024LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 25
  22. 2024PEFTGuard: Detecting Backdoor Attacks Against Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 22
  23. 2024Ten Words Only Still Help: Improving Black-Box AI-Generated Text Detection via Proxy-Guided Efficient Re-Samplingcited by 20
  24. 2025OpenCSG Chinese Corpus: A Series of High-quality Chinese Datasets for LLM Trainingcited by 20
  25. 2024Authorship Obfuscation in Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 19
  26. 2024Hide and Seek: Fingerprinting Large Language Models with Evolutionary Learningcited by 18
  27. 2024Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Userscited by 16
  28. 2024Decoding the AI Pen: Techniques and Challenges in Detecting AI-Generated Textcited by 14
  29. 2024A Watermark for Black-Box Language Modelscited by 14
  30. 2024On the (In)Security of LLM App Storescited by 12
  31. 2018Chinese Lexical Analysis with Deep Bi-GRU-CRF Networkcited by 9
  32. 2024FreqMark: Frequency-Based Watermark for Sentence-Level Detection of LLM-Generated Textcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.