PIP: Physical Interaction Prediction via Mental Simulation with Span Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate prediction of physical interaction outcomes is a crucial component of human intelligence and is important for safe and efficient deployments of robots in the real world. While there are existing vision-based intuitive physics models that learn to predict physical interaction outcomes, they mostly focus on generating short sequences of future frames based on physical properties (e.g. mass, friction and velocity) extracted from visual inputs or a latent space. However, there is a lack of intuitive physics models that are tested on long physical interaction sequences with multiple interactions among different objects. We hypothesize that selective temporal attention during approximate mental simulations helps humans in physical interaction outcome prediction. With these motivations, we propose a novel scheme: Physical Interaction Prediction via Mental Simulation with Span Selection (PIP). It utilizes a deep generative model to model approximate mental simulations by generating future frames of physical interactions before employing selective temporal attention in the form of span selection for predicting physical interaction outcomes. To evaluate our model, we further propose the large-scale SPACE+ dataset of synthetic videos with long sequences of three prime physical interactions in a 3D environment. Our experiments show that PIP outperforms human, baseline, and related intuitive physics models that utilize mental simulation. Furthermore, PIP's span selection module effectively identifies the frames indicating key physical interactions among objects, allowing for added interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2021.
Builds on
26 of 57 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
- 2021VideoGPT: Video Generation using VQ-VAE and Transformerscited by 651
- 2017Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?cited by 551
- 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
14 more
- 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 367
- 2016Unsupervised Learning for Physical Interaction through Video Predictioncited by 256
- 2021A Survey of Embodied AI: From Simulators to Research Taskscited by 256
- 2020Disentangling Physical Dynamics from Unknown Factors for Unsupervised Video Predictioncited by 192
- 2019Scaling Autoregressive Video Modelscited by 189
- 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 145
- 2019CoPhy: Counterfactual Learning of Physical Dynamicscited by 80
- 2016Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Examplecited by 66
- 2015Learning Visual Predictive Models of Physics for Playing Billiardscited by 58
- 2018ShapeStacks: Learning Vision-Based Physical Intuition for Generalised Object Stackingcited by 55
- 2020Would Mega-scale Datasets Further Enhance Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs?cited by 31
- 2018Interpretable Intuitive Physics Modelcited by 19
- 2016To Fall Or Not To Fall: A Visual Approach to Physical Stability Predictioncited by 10
- 2021SPACE: A Simulator for Physical Interactions and Causal Learning in 3D Environmentscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025Unfolding Spatial Cognition: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Visual Simulationscited by 21
- 2026PhysInOne: Visual Physics Learning and Reasoning in One Suitecited by 9
- 2023Benchmarks for Physical Reasoning AIcited by 8
- 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 8
- 2024Take A Step Back: Rethinking the Two Stages in Visual Reasoningcited by 4
- 2025Causal-PIK: Causality-based Physical Reasoning with a Physics-Informed Kernelcited by 2
- 2026IMBench: A Benchmark for Intuitive Robotic Manipulationcited by 1
- 2026PhysNote: Self-Knowledge Notes for Evolvable Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelcited by 0
- 2026IMBench: A Benchmark for Intuitive Robotic Manipulation17 Jul 2026
- 2026PhysNote: Self-Knowledge Notes for Evolvable Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Model27 Apr 2026
- 2026PhysInOne: Visual Physics Learning and Reasoning in One Suite10 Apr 2026
- 2025Unfolding Spatial Cognition: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Visual Simulations5 Jun 2025
- 2025Causal-PIK: Causality-based Physical Reasoning with a Physics-Informed Kernel28 May 2025
- 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models11 Dec 2024
- 2024Take A Step Back: Rethinking the Two Stages in Visual Reasoning29 Jul 2024
- 2023Benchmarks for Physical Reasoning AI17 Dec 2023