Supervising the Transfer of Reasoning Patterns in VQA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Methods for Visual Question Anwering (VQA) are notorious for leveraging dataset biases rather than performing reasoning, hindering generalization. It has been recently shown that better reasoning patterns emerge in attention layers of a state-of-the-art VQA model when they are trained on perfect (oracle) visual inputs. This provides evidence that deep neural networks can learn to reason when training conditions are favorable enough. However, transferring this learned knowledge to deployable models is a challenge, as much of it is lost during the transfer. We propose a method for knowledge transfer based on a regularization term in our loss function, supervising the sequence of required reasoning operations. We provide a theoretical analysis based on PAC-learning, showing that such program prediction can lead to decreased sample complexity under mild hypotheses. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach experimentally on the GQA dataset and show its complementarity to BERT-like self-supervised pre-training.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2021.
Builds on
41 of 55 references.
References · 41
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
29 more
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,553
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 566
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 475
- 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
- 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 372
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
- 2019Deep Modular Co-Attention Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
- 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
- 2018Bilinear Attention Networkscited by 280
- 2019What Can Neural Networks Reason About?cited by 159
- 2017MUTAN: Multimodal Tucker Fusion for Visual Question Answeringcited by 137
- 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
- 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
- 2019Learning by Abstraction: The Neural State Machinecited by 113
- 2016Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?cited by 111
- 2021VinVL: Revisiting Visual Representations in Vision-Language Modelscited by 110
- 2020On the Value of Out-of-Distribution Testing: An Example of Goodhart's Lawcited by 74
- 2021Beyond Question-Based Biases: Assessing Multimodal Shortcut Learning in Visual Question Answeringcited by 71
- 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
- 2019Meta Module Network for Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 39
- 2020Unshuffling Data for Improved Generalizationcited by 35
- 2020Visual Grounding Methods for VQA are Working for the Wrong Reasons!cited by 18
- 2021How Transferable are Reasoning Patterns in VQA?cited by 16
- 2021Are Bias Mitigation Techniques for Deep Learning Effective?cited by 14
- 2019Weak Supervision helps Emergence of Word-Object Alignment and improves Vision-Language Taskscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.
7 papers.
- 2022Multimodal Learning with Transformers: A Surveycited by 400
- 2023Transformers in Speech Processing: A Surveycited by 39
- 2024Look, Listen, and Answer: Overcoming Biases for Audio-Visual Question Answeringcited by 18
- 2024Take A Step Back: Rethinking the Two Stages in Visual Reasoningcited by 4
- 2022An experimental study of the vision-bottleneck in VQAcited by 1
- 2023Curriculum Learning for Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 1
- 2023Multimodal Representations for Teacher-Guided Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 0
- 2024Take A Step Back: Rethinking the Two Stages in Visual Reasoning29 Jul 2024
- 2024Look, Listen, and Answer: Overcoming Biases for Audio-Visual Question Answering18 Apr 2024
- 2023Multimodal Representations for Teacher-Guided Compositional Visual Reasoning24 Oct 2023
- 2023Curriculum Learning for Compositional Visual Reasoning27 Mar 2023
- 2023Transformers in Speech Processing: A Survey21 Mar 2023
- 2022Multimodal Learning with Transformers: A Survey13 Jun 2022
- 2022An experimental study of the vision-bottleneck in VQA14 Feb 2022