mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TAGCOS: Task-agnostic Gradient Clustered Coreset Selection for Instruction Tuning Data

arXiv 2407.15235 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 30

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning has achieved unprecedented success in NLP, turning large language models into versatile chatbots. However, the increasing variety and volume of instruction datasets demand significant computational resources. To address this, it is essential to extract a small and highly informative subset (i.e., Coreset) that achieves comparable performance to the full dataset. Achieving this goal poses non-trivial challenges: 1) data selection requires accurate data representations that reflect the training samples' quality, 2) considering the diverse nature of instruction datasets, and 3) ensuring the efficiency of the coreset selection algorithm for large models. To address these challenges, we propose Task-Agnostic Gradient Clustered COreset Selection (TAGCOS). Specifically, we leverage sample gradients as the data representations, perform clustering to group similar data, and apply an efficient greedy algorithm for coreset selection. Experimental results show that our algorithm, selecting only 5% of the data, surpasses other unsupervised methods and achieves performance close to that of the full dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2024.

Builds on

40 of 59 references.

References · 40

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  8. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  9. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  10. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  11. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  12. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
28 more
  1. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  2. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
  3. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  4. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686
  5. 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 569
  6. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  7. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
  8. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
  9. 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
  10. 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 379
  11. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
  12. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
  13. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
  14. 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
  15. 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2cited by 229
  16. 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 192
  17. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
  18. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
  19. 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 109
  20. 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
  21. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
  22. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  23. 2023Maybe Only 0.5% Data is Needed: A Preliminary Exploration of Low Training Data Instruction Tuningcited by 58
  24. 2016Restricted Strong Convexity Implies Weak Submodularitycited by 52
  25. 2022Self-Guided Noise-Free Data Generation for Efficient Zero-Shot Learningcited by 50
  26. 2024Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language Modelscited by 32
  27. 2024G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based Diverse and High-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine Translationcited by 30
  28. 2023Probabilistic Bilevel Coreset Selectioncited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 15; 2026: 12.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 52
  2. 2025Large-Scale Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 35
  3. 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
  4. 2025Knowledge Distillation and Dataset Distillation of Large Language Models: Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 26
  5. 2025Hierarchical Fine-grained Preference Optimization for Physically Plausible Video Generationcited by 21
  6. 2024DELIFT: Data Efficient Language model Instruction Fine Tuningcited by 14
  7. 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 12
  8. 2025Select2Reason: Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection for Long-CoT Reasoningcited by 7
  9. 2025Mining Useful General Data for Low-Resource Domain Adaptationcited by 4
  10. 2025MergeIT: From Selection to Merging for Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 3
  11. 2025RICo: Refined In-Context Contribution for Automatic Instruction-Tuning Data Selectioncited by 3
  12. 2025TRIM: Token-wise Attention-Derived Saliency for Data-Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 3
18 more
  1. 2024Leveraging Open Knowledge for Advancing Task Expertise in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  2. 2025MASTER: Enhancing Large Language Model via Multi-Agent Simulated Teachingcited by 2
  3. 2025Computational Budget Should Be Considered in Data Selectioncited by 2
  4. 2025GradientSpace: Unsupervised Data Clustering for Improved Instruction Tuningcited by 2
  5. 2025ProDS: Preference-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 1
  6. 2025Investigating Data Pruning for Pretraining Biological Foundation Models at Scalecited by 1
  7. 2026On Representation Redundancy in Large-Scale Instruction Tuning Data Selectioncited by 1
  8. 2026Filter-then-Weight: Online Data Selection and Reweighting for LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 1
  9. 2026GRACE: A Dynamic Coreset Selection Framework for Large Language Model Optimizationcited by 1
  10. 2026DOG-DPO:Dynamic Optimization in Geometry for Safety Alignmentcited by 1
  11. 2026Form Over Content In Gradient-Based Data Attribution Methodscited by 1
  12. 2026RADS: Reinforcement Learning-Based Sample Selection Improves Transfer Learning in Low-resource and Imbalanced Clinical Settingscited by 0
  13. 2026When Does Generating More Help? Disentangling Fixed-Source Synthesis from Source Expansion in Synthetic Data Scalingcited by 0
  14. 2026GRACE:Gradient-guided Coreset Selection for LLM Unlearningcited by 0
  15. 2026Refreshing Less, Selecting Better: Reusing Stale Gradient Features for Efficient Influence-Based Data Selectioncited by 0
  16. 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
  17. 2026Probabilistic Multi-Source Data Selection via Learnable Categorical Priors: Variance Reduction and Guaranteed Derandomizationcited by 0
  18. 2026SelectTTRL: Representation-Guided Data Selection for Efficient Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 0