mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

ProDS: Preference-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2505.12754 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction data selection aims to identify a high-quality subset from the training set that matches or exceeds the performance of the full dataset on target tasks. Existing methods focus on the instruction-to-response mapping, but neglect the human preference for diverse responses. In this paper, we propose Preference-oriented Data Selection method (ProDS) that scores training samples based on their alignment with preferences observed in the target set. Our key innovation lies in shifting the data selection criteria from merely estimating features for accurate response generation to explicitly aligning training samples with human preferences in target tasks. Specifically, direct preference optimization (DPO) is employed to estimate human preferences across diverse responses. Besides, a bidirectional preference synthesis strategy is designed to score training samples according to both positive preferences and negative preferences. Extensive experimental results demonstrate our superiority to existing task-agnostic and targeted methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

27 of 39 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,072
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,979
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,986
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,876
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,765
  8. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,693
  9. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,785
  10. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,120
  11. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,091
  12. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 865
15 more
  1. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 736
  2. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 717
  3. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 518
  4. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 487
  5. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 326
  6. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 303
  7. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 279
  8. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 135
  9. 2023Skill-it! A Data-Driven Skills Framework for Understanding and Training Language Modelscited by 120
  10. 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
  11. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  12. 2023Understanding In-Context Learning via Supportive Pretraining Datacited by 41
  13. 2024TAGCOS: Task-agnostic Gradient Clustered Coreset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datacited by 28
  14. 2023Koala: An Index for Quantifying Overlaps with Pre-training Corporacited by 19
  15. 2023CoachLM: Automatic Instruction Revisions Improve the Data Quality in LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
  2. 2026Instruction Quality Matters: Refining Instructions for Effective Preference Learning
  3. 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
  4. 2025Multi-Level Aware Preference Learning: Enhancing RLHF for Complex Multi-Instruction Tasks
  5. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning
  6. 2024Curry-DPO: Enhancing Alignment using Curriculum Learning & Ranked Preferences
  7. 2025HEAL: A Hypothesis-Based Preference-Aware Analysis Framework
  8. 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment