Filter-then-Weight: Online Data Selection and Reweighting for LLM Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient-based data selection offers a principled framework for estimating sample utility in large language model (LLM) fine-tuning, but existing methods are mostly designed for offline settings. They are therefore less suited to online fine-tuning, where data arrives sequentially, sample utility is step-dependent, and the effective update geometry is shaped by adaptive optimizers. We propose an optimizer-aware framework for gradient-based online data selection and reweighting in LLM fine-tuning. Our key idea is to view online selection not as static sample ranking, but as shaping the next target-oriented update under the current optimizer state. We formulate this as an optimizer-aware update-matching problem, establish its connection to second-order target utility, and show why subset-level construction must account for interactions and redundancy among selected samples. Based on this view, we develop a two-stage Filter-then-Weight algorithm that first filters geometrically useful candidates and then optimizes their coefficients. To make the framework practical for LLMs, we introduce a factorized outer-product gradient representation and optimized matrix computations for long-context data. Experiments show that our method consistently improves convergence and downstream performance over existing online data selection baselines under the same data budget.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.
Builds on
24 of 33 references.
References · 24
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 571
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
12 more
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
- 2024Liger Kernel: Efficient Triton Kernels for LLM Trainingcited by 130
- 2023DoGE: Domain Reweighting with Generalization Estimationcited by 90
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 81
- 2022Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small Costcited by 65
- 2024Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influencecited by 35
- 2024TAGCOS: Task-agnostic Gradient Clustered Coreset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datacited by 30
- 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
- 2026OPUS: Towards Efficient and Principled Data Selection in Large Language Model Pre-training in Every Iterationcited by 21
- 2024Influential Language Data Selection via Gradient Trajectory Pursuitcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.