mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Representation Redundancy in Large-Scale Instruction Tuning Data Selection

arXiv 2602.13773 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data quality is a crucial factor in large language models training. While prior work has shown that models trained on smaller, high-quality datasets can outperform those trained on much larger but noisy or low-quality corpora, systematic methods for industrial-scale data selection in instruction tuning remain underexplored. In this work, we study instruction-tuning data selection through the lens of semantic representation similarity and identify a key limitation of state-of-the-art LLM encoders: they produce highly redundant semantic embeddings. To mitigate this redundancy, we propose Compressed Representation Data Selection (CRDS), a novel framework with two variants. CRDS-R applies Rademacher random projection followed by concatenation of transformer hidden-layer representations, while CRDS-W employs whitening-based dimensionality reduction to improve representational quality. Experimental results demonstrate that both variants substantially enhance data quality and consistently outperform state-of-the-art representation-based selection methods. Notably, CRDS-W achieves strong performance using only 3.5% of the data, surpassing the full-data baseline by an average of 0.71% across four datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/tdano1/CRDS.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2026.

Builds on

48 of 54 references.

References · 48

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  8. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  9. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  10. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  11. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  12. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
36 more
  1. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  2. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  3. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  4. 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 510
  5. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
  6. 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 358
  7. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  8. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  9. 2021Whitening Sentence Representations for Better Semantics and Faster Retrievalcited by 198
  10. 2022DiffCSE: Difference-based Contrastive Learning for Sentence Embeddingscited by 131
  11. 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 108
  12. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
  13. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  14. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  15. 2023One-Shot Learning as Instruction Data Prospector for Large Language Modelscited by 43
  16. 2024SmallToLarge (S2L): Scalable Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models by Summarizing Training Trajectories of Small Modelscited by 43
  17. 2024Provably Robust Multi-bit Watermarking for AI-generated Textcited by 38
  18. 2024SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflectioncited by 34
  19. 2025Large-Scale Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 34
  20. 2025Every Activation Boosted: Scaling General Reasoner to 1 Trillion Open Language Foundationcited by 32
  21. 2024TAGCOS: Task-agnostic Gradient Clustered Coreset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datacited by 28
  22. 2024TSDS: Data Selection for Task-Specific Model Finetuningcited by 28
  23. 2024Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Needcited by 22
  24. 2025D3: Diversity, Difficulty, and Dependability-Aware Data Selection for Sample-Efficient LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 21
  25. 2024SHED: Shapley-Based Automated Dataset Refinement for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 19
  26. 2024Token-wise Influential Training Data Retrieval for Large Language Modelscited by 19
  27. 2025Efficient Data Selection at Scale via Influence Distillationcited by 14
  28. 2024Exploring the Mystery of Influential Data for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 13
  29. 2025MIG: Automatic Data Selection for Instruction Tuning by Maximizing Information Gain in Semantic Spacecited by 12
  30. 2020Selecting Informative Contexts Improves Language Model Finetuningcited by 11
  31. 2024Compute-Constrained Data Selectioncited by 10
  32. 2025Importance-Aware Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 7
  33. 2025TRIM: Token-wise Attention-Derived Saliency for Data-Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 3
  34. 2025Mining Useful General Data for Low-Resource Domain Adaptationcited by 3
  35. 2025RICo: Refined In-Context Contribution for Automatic Instruction-Tuning Data Selectioncited by 2
  36. 2025GradientSpace: Unsupervised Data Clustering for Improved Instruction Tuningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.