mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RICo: Refined In-Context Contribution for Automatic Instruction-Tuning Data Selection

arXiv 2505.05327 ↗First posted 8 May 2025cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data selection for instruction tuning is crucial for improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) while reducing training costs. In this paper, we propose Refined Contribution Measurement with In-Context Learning (RICo), a novel gradient-free method that quantifies the fine-grained contribution of individual samples to both task-level and global-level model performance. RICo enables more accurate identification of high-contribution data, leading to better instruction tuning. We further introduce a lightweight selection paradigm trained on RICo scores, enabling scalable data selection with a strictly linear inference complexity. Extensive experiments on three LLMs across 12 benchmarks and 5 pairwise evaluation sets demonstrate the effectiveness of RICo. Remarkably, on LLaMA3.1-8B, models trained on 15% of RICo-selected data outperform full datasets by 5.42% points and exceed the best performance of widely used selection methods by 2.06% points. We further analyze high-contribution samples selected by RICo, which show both diverse tasks and appropriate difficulty levels, rather than just the hardest ones.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.

Builds on

57 of 78 references.

References · 57

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  8. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  9. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  10. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  11. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  12. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
38 more
  1. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  2. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  3. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
  4. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  5. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  6. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  7. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
  8. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  9. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
  10. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  11. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  12. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  13. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
  14. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 346
  15. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
  16. 2023Can We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?cited by 285
  17. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
  18. 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
  19. 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
  20. 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 201
  21. 2023A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicitycited by 182
  22. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
  23. 2023MMC: Advancing Multimodal Chart Understanding with Large-scale Instruction Tuningcited by 150
  24. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
  25. 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
  26. 2023Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generationcited by 97
  27. 2024Keeping LLMs Aligned After Fine-tuning: The Crucial Role of Prompt Templatescited by 96
  28. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  29. 2024In-context Learning with Retrieved Demonstrations for Language Models: A Surveycited by 70
  30. 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 57
  31. 2023Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Taskscited by 55
  32. 2024Instruction-tuned Language Models are Better Knowledge Learnerscited by 55
  33. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  34. 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 52
  35. 2024SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflectioncited by 34
  36. 2024G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based Diverse and High-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine Translationcited by 30
  37. 2024TAGCOS: Task-agnostic Gradient Clustered Coreset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datacited by 30
  38. 2022Data-Efficient Finetuning Using Cross-Task Nearest Neighborscited by 26

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.