mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SelectTTRL: Representation-Guided Data Selection for Efficient Test-Time Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2610.16104 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL training of language and agent models

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (TTRL) enables large language models to adapt directly on unlabeled test problems by constructing pseudo-labels from multiple sampled responses. However, existing TTRL methods typically apply the same expensive sampling and optimization procedure to all test problems, despite substantial differences in their training utility. In this paper, we study whether such problems can be identified before costly test-time training, without access to ground-truth answers. We uncover a stable relationship between internal response representations and problem-level empirical accuracy. Specifically, we define COS as the cosine similarity between a model's response representation and a correctness-related direction constructed from an independent question-answering dataset. COS consistently correlates with problem solvability across different models, datasets, and experimental settings, and we further provide a theoretical analysis explaining this relationship. Building on this finding, we propose SelectTTRL, a representation-guided data selection method that ranks test problems using COS and applies TTRL only to a selected percentile interval. SelectTTRL leaves the standard TTRL pipeline unchanged for the selected problems, while avoiding unnecessary multi-response sampling and reinforcement learning updates on the remaining ones. Experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SelectTTRL substantially reduces test-time computation while maintaining or improving the performance of standard TTRL. Code is available at https://github.com/heyiliyi/SelectTTRL-public.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 39 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

39 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Detecting and Mitigating the Correct-Answer Extinction Window in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Majority Voting19 May
  2. 2026What If Consensus Lies? Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning at Test Time20 Mar
  3. 2025Beyond Majority Voting: Towards Fine-grained and More Reliable Reward Signal for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning17 Dec
  4. 2025Self-Harmony: Learning to Harmonize Self-Supervision and Self-Play in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning3 Nov

Other references · 35

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  7. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  8. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  9. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  10. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  11. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  12. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
23 more
  1. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
  2. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  3. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  4. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
  5. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
  6. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
  7. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  8. 2024Steering Knowledge Selection Behaviours in LLMs via SAE-Based Representation Engineeringcited by 63
  9. 2025Unlocking General Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Representation Engineeringcited by 36
  10. 2025ETTRL: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in LLM Test-Time Reinforcement Learning Via Entropy Mechanismcited by 36
  11. 2024TAGCOS: Task-agnostic Gradient Clustered Coreset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datacited by 30
  12. 2025SAE-SSV: Supervised Steering in Sparse Representation Spaces for Reliable Control of Language Modelscited by 29
  13. 2026How do LLMs Compute Verbal Confidencecited by 26
  14. 2025Improving Reasoning Performance in Large Language Models via Representation Engineeringcited by 23
  15. 2026Controllable LLM Reasoning via Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steeringcited by 15
  16. 2025Feature Extraction and Steering for Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 13
  17. 2025LearnAlign: Data Selection for LLM Reinforcement Learning with Improved Gradient Alignmentcited by 9
  18. 2025UFO-RL: Uncertainty-Focused Optimization for Efficient Reinforcement Learning Data Selectioncited by 6
  19. 2025AIR: Post-training Data Selection for Reasoning via Attention Head Influencecited by 3
  20. 2026DiSCTT: Consensus-Guided Self-Curriculum for Efficient Test-Time Adaptation in Reasoningcited by 3
  21. 2026Understanding and Mitigating Spurious Signal Amplification in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Math Reasoningcited by 3
  22. 2025CG-TTRL: Context-Guided Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for On-Device Large Language Modelscited by 2
  23. 2026Single-Rollout Hidden-State Dynamics for Training-Free RLVR Data Selectioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026TR-ICRL: Test-Time Rethinking for In-Context Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026TTPO: Test-Time Policy Optimization
  4. 2026Label-free steering: Compressing test-time reinforcement learning into bias-only subspaces
  5. 2025Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Training
  6. 2026Exploiting Verification-Generation Gap: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Confidence-Conditioned Verification
  7. 2026Hi-TTRL: Regulating Consensus with Hints for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026TTVS: Boosting Self-Exploring Reinforcement Learning via Test-time Variational Synthesis