mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Open Knowledge for Advancing Task Expertise in Large Language Models

arXiv 2408.15915 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models

Abstract (arXiv)

The cultivation of expertise for large language models (LLMs) to solve tasks of specific areas often requires special-purpose tuning with calibrated behaviors on the expected stable outputs. To avoid huge cost brought by manual preparation of instruction datasets and training resources up to hundreds of hours, the exploitation of open knowledge including a wealth of low rank adaptation (LoRA) models and instruction datasets serves as a good starting point. However, existing methods on model and data selection focus on the performance of general-purpose capabilities while neglecting the knowledge gap exposed in domain-specific deployment. In the present study, we propose to bridge such gap by introducing few human-annotated samples (i.e., K-shot) for advancing task expertise of LLMs with open knowledge. Specifically, we develop an efficient and scalable pipeline to cost-efficiently produce task experts where K-shot data intervene in selecting the most promising expert candidates and the task-relevant instructions. A mixture-of-expert (MoE) system is built to make the best use of individual-yet-complementary knowledge between multiple experts. We unveil the two keys to the success of a MoE system, 1) the abidance by K-shot, and 2) the insistence on diversity. For the former, we ensure that models that truly possess problem-solving abilities on K-shot are selected rather than those blind guessers. Besides, during data selection, instructions that share task-relevant contexts with K-shot are prioritized. For the latter, we highlight the diversity of constituting experts and that of the fine-tuning instructions throughout the model and data selection process. Extensive experimental results confirm the superiority of our approach over existing methods on utilization of open knowledge across various tasks. Our codes will be available at https://github.com/Yaphabates/Rocket.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 96 of its 125 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.

Builds on

96 of 125 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Self-MoE: Towards Compositional Large Language Models with Self-Specialized Experts17 Jun
  2. 2024Branch-Train-MiX: Mixing Expert LLMs into a Mixture-of-Experts LLM12 Mar
  3. 2022Sparse Upcycling: Training Mixture-of-Experts from Dense Checkpoints9 Dec

Other references · 93

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  8. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  9. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  10. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  11. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  12. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
38 more
  1. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  2. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  4. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  5. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  6. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  7. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  8. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  9. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  10. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  11. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  12. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
  13. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  14. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  15. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  16. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
  17. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  18. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
  19. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  20. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
  21. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  22. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  23. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
  24. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  25. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
  26. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
  27. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
  28. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  29. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  30. 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 441
  31. 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 384
  32. 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 369
  33. 2021Dataset Condensation with Distribution Matchingcited by 362
  34. 2023LoraHub: Efficient Cross-Task Generalization via Dynamic LoRA Compositioncited by 359
  35. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  36. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 322
  37. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  38. 2024PiSSA: Principal Singular Values and Singular Vectors Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 261

50 most cited of 93 All 93 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Training-Free Dynamic Upcycling of Expert Language Models
  2. 2026XPERT: Expert Knowledge Transfer for Effective Training of Language Models
  3. 2025Mixture of Experts in Large Language Models
  4. 2024A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Models
  5. 2025Advancing Expert Specialization for Better MoE
  6. 2025L-MoE: End-to-End Training of a Lightweight Mixture of Low-Rank Adaptation Experts
  7. 2023Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning:A Winning Combination for Large Language Models
  8. 2026Routing-Aligned Fine-Tuning for Multilingual Downstream Tasks in Mixture-of-Experts Models