mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Refreshing Less, Selecting Better: Reusing Stale Gradient Features for Efficient Influence-Based Data Selection

arXiv 2609.32888 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gradient-based data selection methods such as LESS score each candidate by the alignment between its gradient and a target validation gradient, and recomputing per-example gradient features at every new checkpoint dominates their cost. Across three selection seeds, two model families, two candidate pools, and two target tasks, features cached at a post-warmup checkpoint and paired with fresh validation gradients preserve the ranking 40 optimizer steps later with Spearman correlation from 0.952 to 0.991, while the top-10% subset they induce misses 10 to 22% of the examples that full recomputation selects. We therefore propose Cached Diverse Influence Selection (CDIS), which recomputes gradient features for the top-ranked fraction p of candidates under the stale scores, fits an affine calibration on the recomputed examples, and selects the final subset under source and length quotas. A refresh fraction at or above the selection fraction recovers the exact top-k subset whenever the calibrated stale scores have bounded error, and the budget curves follow this rule: at p=0.3 the recovered top-k subset coincides with full recomputation in every setting, allocating the same budget per stratum recovers the stratified subset at 0.92 to 1.00, and gradient-stage wall-clock drops 3.5 to 3.6 times. Iterating the cache over four checkpoints keeps top-k overlap at 0.98 or higher at 1.9 gradient features per example against 4 for full recomputation, and stale-to-recomputed agreement on the refreshed examples provides a free check for unsafe reuse. Downstream, unconstrained top-k selection collapses to a single data source and scores 13 points below random selection on GSM8K. CDIS scores 12 points above random selection with paired confidence intervals that exclude zero and trails full recomputation by 4.3 points, one training-run standard deviation, at 3.4 times lower selection cost.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

29 of 34 references.

References · 29

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  7. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  8. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  9. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  10. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  11. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
  12. 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
17 more
  1. 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 318
  2. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
  3. 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
  4. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
  5. 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 123
  6. 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 109
  7. 2024DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodelscited by 105
  8. 2024MATES: Model-Aware Data Selection for Efficient Pretraining with Data Influence Modelscited by 100
  9. 2024What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functionscited by 94
  10. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  11. 2024Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influencecited by 35
  12. 2024G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based Diverse and High-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine Translationcited by 30
  13. 2024TAGCOS: Task-agnostic Gradient Clustered Coreset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datacited by 30
  14. 2025Improving Influence-based Instruction Tuning Data Selection for Balanced Learning of Diverse Capabilitiescited by 23
  15. 2024Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Needcited by 22
  16. 2025D3: Diversity, Difficulty, and Dependability-Aware Data Selection for Sample-Efficient LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 21
  17. 2026Influence-Preserving Proxies for Gradient-Based Data Selection in LLM Fine-tuningcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.