Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable video understanding requires high-quality video datasets that can provide both precise semantic labels and temporally consistent annotations. Detecting annotation errors in densely labeled videos is challenging because errors may arise from semantic **mislabeling**, where labels disagree with visual content, or temporal **disordering**, where otherwise plausible labels violate procedural progression. Training dynamics have been used to identify mislabeled training examples primarily for static samples. We investigate checkpoint loss dynamics for **out-of-sample auditing** of temporally annotated videos. We compute **Cumulative Sample Loss (CSL)** as the mean annotation-conditioned loss of an audit frame across checkpoints trained on a *disjoint* reference set. CSL acts as a dynamic fingerprint and captures the persistent disagreement between its annotation and learned visual-temporal structure. High-CSL frames are then flagged as likely candidates for potential annotation errors, including semantic mislabeling or temporal disordering. Experiments on EgoPER and Cholec80 show that CSL substantially outperforms final-checkpoint loss and achieves up to a **4.2-point AUC improvement** over prior baselines on EgoPER and **92.0/78.5 AUC** for mislabeling/disordering on Cholec80. These results demonstrate checkpoint loss dynamics as an effective diagnostic for temporal annotation auditing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.
Builds on
31 of 51 references.
References · 31
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
- 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2019MS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentationcited by 370
- 2016EndoNet: A Deep Architecture for Recognition Tasks on Laparoscopic Videoscited by 366
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
19 more
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
- 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearningcited by 261
- 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2021ASFormer: Transformer for Action Segmentationcited by 166
- 2020TeCNO: Surgical Phase Recognition with Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Networkscited by 139
- 2021A Hybrid Video Anomaly Detection Framework via Memory-Augmented Flow Reconstruction and Flow-Guided Frame Predictioncited by 129
- 2021Self-Supervised Predictive Convolutional Attentive Block for Anomaly Detectioncited by 119
- 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
- 2022Generative Cooperative Learning for Unsupervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 102
- 2024Corrective Machine Unlearningcited by 26
- 2024Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labelscited by 25
- 2023Memorization Through the Lens of Curvature of Loss Function Around Samplescited by 24
- 2022CTRL: Clustering Training Losses for Label Error Detectioncited by 17
- 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustnesscited by 10
- 2024Learning Discriminative Dynamics with Label Corruption for Noisy Label Detectioncited by 8
- 2024Learning under Label Noise through Few-Shot Human-in-the-Loop Refinementcited by 3
- 2025Open set label noise learning with robust sample selection and margin-guided modulecited by 1
- 2025REMAP: Regularized Matching and Partial Alignment of Video Embeddingscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.