mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories

arXiv 2602.15154 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable video understanding requires high-quality video datasets that can provide both precise semantic labels and temporally consistent annotations. Detecting annotation errors in densely labeled videos is challenging because errors may arise from semantic **mislabeling**, where labels disagree with visual content, or temporal **disordering**, where otherwise plausible labels violate procedural progression. Training dynamics have been used to identify mislabeled training examples primarily for static samples. We investigate checkpoint loss dynamics for **out-of-sample auditing** of temporally annotated videos. We compute **Cumulative Sample Loss (CSL)** as the mean annotation-conditioned loss of an audit frame across checkpoints trained on a *disjoint* reference set. CSL acts as a dynamic fingerprint and captures the persistent disagreement between its annotation and learned visual-temporal structure. High-CSL frames are then flagged as likely candidates for potential annotation errors, including semantic mislabeling or temporal disordering. Experiments on EgoPER and Cholec80 show that CSL substantially outperforms final-checkpoint loss and achieves up to a **4.2-point AUC improvement** over prior baselines on EgoPER and **92.0/78.5 AUC** for mislabeling/disordering on Cholec80. These results demonstrate checkpoint loss dynamics as an effective diagnostic for temporal annotation auditing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.

Builds on

31 of 51 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  3. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  5. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  6. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  7. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  8. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  9. 2019MS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentationcited by 370
  10. 2016EndoNet: A Deep Architecture for Recognition Tasks on Laparoscopic Videoscited by 366
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
19 more
  1. 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
  2. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearningcited by 261
  3. 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
  4. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  5. 2021ASFormer: Transformer for Action Segmentationcited by 166
  6. 2020TeCNO: Surgical Phase Recognition with Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Networkscited by 139
  7. 2021A Hybrid Video Anomaly Detection Framework via Memory-Augmented Flow Reconstruction and Flow-Guided Frame Predictioncited by 129
  8. 2021Self-Supervised Predictive Convolutional Attentive Block for Anomaly Detectioncited by 119
  9. 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
  10. 2022Generative Cooperative Learning for Unsupervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 102
  11. 2024Corrective Machine Unlearningcited by 26
  12. 2024Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labelscited by 25
  13. 2023Memorization Through the Lens of Curvature of Loss Function Around Samplescited by 24
  14. 2022CTRL: Clustering Training Losses for Label Error Detectioncited by 17
  15. 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustnesscited by 10
  16. 2024Learning Discriminative Dynamics with Label Corruption for Noisy Label Detectioncited by 8
  17. 2024Learning under Label Noise through Few-Shot Human-in-the-Loop Refinementcited by 3
  18. 2025Open set label noise learning with robust sample selection and margin-guided modulecited by 1
  19. 2025REMAP: Regularized Matching and Partial Alignment of Video Embeddingscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.