mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robustness to Label Noise Depends on the Shape of the Noise Distribution in Feature Space

arXiv 2206.01106 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning classifiers have been demonstrated, both empirically and theoretically, to be robust to label noise under certain conditions -- notably the typical assumption is that label noise is independent of the features given the class label. We provide a theoretical framework that generalizes beyond this typical assumption by modeling label noise as a distribution over feature space. We show that both the scale and the shape of the noise distribution influence the posterior likelihood; and the shape of the noise distribution has a stronger impact on classification performance if the noise is concentrated in feature space where the decision boundary can be moved. For the special case of uniform label noise (independent of features and the class label), we show that the Bayes optimal classifier for c classes is robust to label noise until the ratio of noisy samples goes above fracc-1c (e.g. 90% for 10 classes), which we call the tipping point. However, for the special case of class-dependent label noise (independent of features given the class label), the tipping point can be as low as 50%. Most importantly, we show that when the noise distribution targets decision boundaries (label noise is directly dependent on feature space), classification robustness can drop off even at a small scale of noise. Even when evaluating recent label-noise mitigation methods we see reduced accuracy when label noise is dependent on features. These findings explain why machine learning often handles label noise well if the noise distribution is uniform in feature-space; yet it also points to the difficulty of overcoming label noise when it is concentrated in a region of feature space where a decision boundary can move.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2022.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  7. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  8. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  9. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  10. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
7 more
  1. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  2. 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 165
  3. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 161
  4. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  5. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
  6. 2015Learning Summary Statistic for Approximate Bayesian Computation via Deep Neural Networkcited by 39
  7. 2020Learning Soft Labels via Meta Learningcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: