mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Unseen Targets of Hate -- A Systematic Review of Hateful Communication Datasets

arXiv 2405.08562 ↗First posted 14 May 2024cs.CL cs.CYcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML)-based content moderation tools are essential to keep online spaces free from hateful communication. Yet, ML tools can only be as capable as the quality of the data they are trained on allows them. While there is increasing evidence that they underperform in detecting hateful communications directed towards specific identities and may discriminate against them, we know surprisingly little about the provenance of such bias. To fill this gap, we present a systematic review of the datasets for the automated detection of hateful communication introduced over the past decade, and unpack the quality of the datasets in terms of the identities that they embody: those of the targets of hateful communication that the data curators focused on, as well as those unintentionally included in the datasets. We find, overall, a skewed representation of selected target identities and mismatches between the targets that research conceptualizes and ultimately includes in datasets. Yet, by contextualizing these findings in the language and location of origin of the datasets, we highlight a positive trend towards the broadening and diversification of this research space.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2024.

Builds on

25 of 69 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  2. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
  3. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  4. 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 258
  5. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
  6. 2018Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forumcited by 196
  7. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 139
  8. 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
  9. 2019A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speechcited by 128
  10. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 115
  11. 2017Detecting Online Hate Speech Using Context Aware Modelscited by 72
  12. 2020Measuring a hate speech spectrum with faceted Rasch item response theory and perspective-aware, explainable-by-design deep learningcited by 67
13 more
  1. 2018Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 59
  2. 2021Just Say No: Analyzing the Stance of Neural Dialogue Generation in Offensive Contextscited by 56
  3. 2023When Do Annotator Demographics Matter? Measuring the Influence of Annotator Demographics with the POPQUORN Datasetcited by 51
  4. 2016Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Mediacited by 48
  5. 2020"Call me sexist, but...": Revisiting Sexism Detection Using Psychological Scales and Adversarial Samplescited by 48
  6. 2018Peer to Peer Hate: Hate Speech Instigators and Their Targetscited by 30
  7. 2021A systematic review of Hate Speech automatic detection using Natural Language Processingcited by 26
  8. 2021Ruddit: Norms of Offensiveness for English Reddit Commentscited by 26
  9. 2021"Garbage In, Garbage Out" Revisited: What Do Machine Learning Application Papers Report About Human-Labeled Training Data?cited by 24
  10. 2022Listening to Affected Communities to Define Extreme Speech: Dataset and Experimentscited by 21
  11. 2022Data-Efficient Strategies for Expanding Hate Speech Detection into Under-Resourced Languagescited by 7
  12. 2019TED-On: A Total Error Framework for Digital Traces of Human Behavior on Online Platformscited by 4
  13. 2021A survey on extremism analysis using Natural Language Processingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

6 papers.