mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shift

arXiv 2606.25152 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deployed approaches for AI text detection often rely on training-time access to labeled datasets of both human-written and AI-generated text. This approach is vulnerable to three types of distribution shifts that occur continually post-deployment, and for which labeled data is often unavailable: adversarial humanization, new LLMs being released, and temporal drift in human writing. Simultaneously, existing approaches do not leverage a key signal of LLM usage: inference-time homogeneity. We propose a test-time adaptation (TTA) approach, using semi-supervised learning, that adapts to distribution shifts by leveraging homogeneity among unlabeled samples observed at inference time. Empirically, we find that state-of-the-art supervised detectors systematically fail when they encounter distribution shifts in AI-generated and human writing, both adversarial and natural, while test-time adaptation with semi-supervised learning is largely robust; e.g., the commercial model Pangram detects just 24.1% of our adversarial AI-generated text, compared to 90.5% for our test-time approach. We establish that test-time adaptation is a promising framework for AI text detection in the wild. We publicly release our code (which includes code for model training, evaluation, and plots) at https://github.com/kkr36/llm_detection.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 84 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

84 of 111 references.

References · 84

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  6. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  7. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  8. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  9. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  10. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  11. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  12. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
38 more
  1. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  2. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  3. 2020Performative Predictioncited by 318
  4. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  5. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 256
  6. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  7. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  8. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  9. 2023Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?cited by 190
  10. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
  11. 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 165
  12. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
  13. 2024Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviewscited by 160
  14. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 157
  15. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
  16. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
  17. 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 112
  18. 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 111
  19. 2018The Social Cost of Strategic Classificationcited by 105
  20. 2022Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawedcited by 104
  21. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 101
  22. 2021Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfarecited by 98
  23. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 90
  24. 2018How Do Classifiers Induce Agents To Invest Effort Strategically?cited by 82
  25. 2023OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examplescited by 80
  26. 2018The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulationcited by 75
  27. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  28. 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 59
  29. 2025Great Models Think Alike and this Undermines AI Oversightcited by 53
  30. 2021Mixture Proportion Estimation and PU Learning: A Modern Approachcited by 52
  31. 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 52
  32. 2025The Widespread Adoption of Large Language Model-Assisted Writing Across Societycited by 50
  33. 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  34. 2025Correlated Errors in Large Language Modelscited by 42
  35. 2024Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representationscited by 40
  36. 2025People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated textcited by 39
  37. 2023HC3 Plus: A Semantic-Invariant Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpuscited by 33
  38. 2024Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifiercited by 32

50 most cited of 84 All 84 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.