mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectors

arXiv 2312.12918 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2023cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To combat the potential misuse of Natural Language Generation (NLG) technology, a variety of algorithms have been developed for the detection of AI-generated texts. Traditionally, this task is treated as a binary classification problem. Although supervised learning has demonstrated promising results, acquiring labeled data for detection purposes poses real-world challenges and the risk of overfitting. In an effort to address these issues, we delve into the realm of zero-shot machine-generated text detection. Existing zero-shot detectors, typically designed for specific tasks or topics, often assume uniform testing scenarios, limiting their practicality. In our research, we explore various advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) and their specialized variants, contributing to this field in several ways. In empirical studies, we uncover a significant correlation between topics and detection performance. Secondly, we delve into the influence of topic shifts on zero-shot detectors. These investigations shed light on the adaptability and robustness of these detection methods across diverse topics. The code is available at urlhttps://github.com/yfzhang114/robustness-detection.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2023.

Builds on

19 of 21 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  7. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  8. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  9. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  10. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  11. 2019CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Searchcited by 638
  12. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
7 more
  1. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  2. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  3. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 126
  4. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  5. 2023Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generationcited by 116
  6. 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 98
  7. 2023Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.