OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating novelty is critical yet challenging in peer review, as reviewers must assess submissions against a vast, rapidly evolving literature. This report presents OpenNovelty, an LLM-powered agentic system for transparent, evidence-based novelty analysis. The system operates through four phases: (1) extracting the core task and contribution claims to generate retrieval queries; (2) retrieving relevant prior work based on extracted queries via semantic search engine; (3) constructing a hierarchical taxonomy of core-task-related work and performing contribution-level full-text comparisons against each contribution; and (4) synthesizing all analyses into a structured novelty report with explicit citations and evidence snippets. Unlike naive LLM-based approaches, textscOpenNovelty grounds all assessments in retrieved real papers, ensuring verifiable judgments. We deploy our system on 500+ ICLR 2026 submissions with all reports publicly available on our website, and preliminary analysis suggests it can identify relevant prior work, including closely related papers that authors may overlook. OpenNovelty aims to empower the research community with a scalable tool that promotes fair, consistent, and evidence-backed peer review.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 35 references.
References · 18
- 2024Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviewscited by 164
- 2025AgentGym-RL: Training LLM Agents for Long-Horizon Decision Making through Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
- 2024The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Ratescited by 69
- 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A surveycited by 61
- 2025Evaluating Scoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 43
- 2024Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysiscited by 33
- 2022MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review datasetcited by 32
- 2024Evaluating and Enhancing Large Language Models for Novelty Assessment in Scholarly Publicationscited by 26
- 2025Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviewscited by 24
- 2021Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challengescited by 21
- 2025Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research Paperscited by 20
- 2025Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideascited by 19
6 more
- 2025GraphEval: A Lightweight Graph-Based LLM Framework for Idea Evaluationcited by 17
- 2025Beyond "Not Novel Enough": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedbackcited by 12
- 2025Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluatorcited by 9
- 2025SC4ANM: Identifying Optimal Section Combinations for Automated Novelty Prediction in Academic Paperscited by 8
- 2025Harnessing Large Language Models for Scientific Novelty Detectioncited by 6
- 2025GraphMind: Interactive Novelty Assessment System for Accelerating Scientific Discoverycited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning Problemcited by 8
- 2026Can Deep Research Agents Retrieve and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomiescited by 3
- 2026PRISM: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Peer Reviewerscited by 3
- 2026ResearchStudio-Idea: An Evidence-Grounded Research-Ideation Skill Suite from ML Conference Outcomescited by 2
- 2026SciAtlas: A Computable Atlas of Science for Knowledge-Grounded AI Researchcited by 1
- 2026Do Methods Support the Claims? Intra-Paper Verification for Peer Reviewcited by 1
- 2026RINI: Seeing the Prior Is Not Enoughcited by 0
- 2026Learning Individual Scientific Taste with Privileged Hindsight Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Learning Individual Scientific Taste with Privileged Hindsight Distillation14 Oct 2026
- 2026RINI: Seeing the Prior Is Not Enough27 Sep 2026
- 2026ResearchStudio-Idea: An Evidence-Grounded Research-Ideation Skill Suite from ML Conference Outcomes5 Jul 2026
- 2026Do Methods Support the Claims? Intra-Paper Verification for Peer Review21 Jun 2026
- 2026PRISM: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Peer Reviewers26 May 2026
- 2026SciAtlas: A Computable Atlas of Science for Knowledge-Grounded AI Research20 May 2026
- 2026InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning Problem16 Feb 2026
- 2026Can Deep Research Agents Retrieve and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomies18 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026MemoNoveltyAgent: A Historical Research Memory-Aware Agent Workflow for Paper Novelty Assessment
- 2026Evaluating and Guarding Citation Faithfulness in Agentic Scientific Synthesis
- 2026Benchmarking Agentic Review Systems
- 2026Are we still able to recognize pearls? Machine-driven peer review and the risk to creativity: An explainable RAG-XAI detection framework with markers extraction
- 2025Open-Source Agentic Hybrid RAG Framework for Scientific Literature Review
- 2026InternReviewer & InternAdvocate: Objective Reward and Evaluation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Peer Review and Rebuttal
- 2025BadScientist: Can a Research Agent Write Convincing but Unsound Papers that Fool LLM Reviewers?
- 2026ScholarQuest: A Taxonomy-Guided Benchmark for Agentic Academic Paper Search in Open Literature Environments