Smaller, Younger, and More Impactful: How AI-Assisted Writing Transforms Research Teams
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The era of Big Science has long been defined by increasingly large and specialized research teams pushing the frontiers of knowledge. However, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), are beginning to reshape academic writing and scientific research, potentially disrupting the longstanding trend toward ever-larger teams and transforming other dimensions of research team structure. Drawing on 147,074 full-text publications from the PLoS family and the Nature portfolio since 2020, we examined whether and how AI-assisted writing influences team structure and team outcomes in science. Using multiple methods, including ordinary least square, quantile regression, Poisson regression, logistic regression and propensity score matching, we found that research teams using AI-assisted writing tend to be younger and smaller. Importantly, this shift toward more compact, junior-leaning teams does not come at the expense of scientific impact. On the contrary, we observed a higher probability of research teams that employed AI-assisted writing producing highly impactful publications. These results highlight the significant role of AI-assisted writing in reshaping not only how research is produced, but also how research teams are formed and assembled. Our findings call for policy improvements in research evaluation, funding, and training to address this emerging trend.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
17 of 80 references.
References · 17
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
- 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 165
- 2024Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviewscited by 160
- 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
- 2024Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challengescited by 41
- 2024Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challengescited by 30
- 2026Scientific production in the era of Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2025Academic journals' AI policies fail to curb the surge in AI-assisted academic writingcited by 12
- 2024Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopuscited by 10
- 2014Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900cited by 8
5 more
- 2023How should the advent of large language models affect the practice of science?cited by 8
- 2020Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty: Evidence from COVID-19cited by 6
- 2025Science Is Falling Behind the Frontier: Foundation Model Adoption Across Half a Million Paperscited by 5
- 2023The Impact of Heterogeneous Shared Leadership in Scientific Teamscited by 2
- 2025Hidden Division of Labor in Scientific Teams Revealed Through 1.6 Million LaTeX Filescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.