mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse Beats Dense: Rethinking Supervision in Radar-Camera Depth Completion

arXiv 2312.00844 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is widely believed that sparse supervision is worse than dense supervision in the field of depth completion, but the underlying reasons for this are rarely discussed. To this end, we revisit the task of radar-camera depth completion and present a new method with sparse LiDAR supervision to outperform previous dense LiDAR supervision methods in both accuracy and speed. Specifically, when trained by sparse LiDAR supervision, depth completion models usually output depth maps containing significant stripe-like artifacts. We find that such a phenomenon is caused by the implicitly learned positional distribution pattern from sparse LiDAR supervision, termed as LiDAR Distribution Leakage (LDL) in this paper. Based on such understanding, we present a novel Disruption-Compensation radar-camera depth completion framework to address this issue. The Disruption part aims to deliberately disrupt the learning of LiDAR distribution from sparse supervision, while the Compensation part aims to leverage 3D spatial and 2D semantic information to compensate for the information loss of previous disruptions. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that by reducing the impact of LDL, our framework with sparse supervision outperforms the state-of-the-art dense supervision methods with 11.6% improvement in Mean Absolute Error (MAE)} and 1.6x speedup in Frame Per Second (FPS)}. The code is available at https://github.com/megvii-research/Sparse-Beats-Dense.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2023.

Builds on

44 of 56 references.

References · 44

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  4. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  5. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  6. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  7. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  8. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  9. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,037
  10. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
  11. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  12. 2020Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3Dcited by 1,040
32 more
  1. 2022Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictionscited by 564
  2. 2022PETR: Position Embedding Transformation for Multi-View 3D Object Detectioncited by 550
  3. 2023Tri-Perspective View for Vision-Based 3D Semantic Occupancy Predictioncited by 404
  4. 2020Deep Local Shapes: Learning Local SDF Priors for Detailed 3D Reconstructioncited by 321
  5. 2020Non-Local Spatial Propagation Network for Depth Completioncited by 194
  6. 2022FUTR3D: A Unified Sensor Fusion Framework for 3D Detectioncited by 194
  7. 2019Meta-SR: A Magnification-Arbitrary Network for Super-Resolutioncited by 180
  8. 2017Sparse-to-Dense: Depth Prediction from Sparse Depth Samples and a Single Imagecited by 159
  9. 2020CenterFusion: Center-based Radar and Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 159
  10. 2021PENet: Towards Precise and Efficient Image Guided Depth Completioncited by 146
  11. 2018DeepLiDAR: Deep Surface Normal Guided Depth Prediction for Outdoor Scene from Sparse LiDAR Data and Single Color Imagecited by 129
  12. 2020Kinematic 3D Object Detection in Monocular Videocited by 116
  13. 2018Depth Estimation via Affinity Learned with Convolutional Spatial Propagation Networkcited by 109
  14. 2022K-Radar: 4D Radar Object Detection for Autonomous Driving in Various Weather Conditionscited by 107
  15. 2022P3Depth: Monocular Depth Estimation with a Piecewise Planarity Priorcited by 106
  16. 2023CompletionFormer: Depth Completion with Convolutions and Vision Transformerscited by 92
  17. 2021EagerMOT: 3D Multi-Object Tracking via Sensor Fusioncited by 83
  18. 2023CRN: Camera Radar Net for Accurate, Robust, Efficient 3D Perceptioncited by 81
  19. 2021RigNet: Repetitive Image Guided Network for Depth Completioncited by 80
  20. 2018Motion Planning Networkscited by 78
  21. 2022Dynamic Spatial Propagation Network for Depth Completioncited by 70
  22. 2022CRAFT: Camera-Radar 3D Object Detection with Spatio-Contextual Fusion Transformercited by 66
  23. 2021Radar-Camera Pixel Depth Association for Depth Completioncited by 49
  24. 2020Depth Estimation from Monocular Images and Sparse Radar Datacited by 44
  25. 2019Depth Coefficients for Depth Completioncited by 41
  26. 2021Depth Completion with Twin Surface Extrapolation at Occlusion Boundariescited by 41
  27. 2021R4Dyn: Exploring Radar for Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation of Dynamic Scenescited by 36
  28. 2021Depth Estimation from Monocular Images and Sparse radar using Deep Ordinal Regression Networkcited by 32
  29. 2022CramNet: Camera-Radar Fusion with Ray-Constrained Cross-Attention for Robust 3D Object Detectioncited by 30
  30. 2021MmWave Radar and Vision Fusion for Object Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Reviewcited by 22
  31. 2021Full-Velocity Radar Returns by Radar-Camera Fusioncited by 16
  32. 2022How Much Depth Information can Radar Contribute to a Depth Estimation Model?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

12 papers.