mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Survey

arXiv 2310.15264 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 28

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses. However, despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs such as spreading misinformation, generating fake news, plagiarism in academia, and contaminating the web. To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text. The basic idea is that whenever we can tell if the given text is either written by a human or an AI, we can utilize this information to address the above-mentioned concerns. To that end, a plethora of detection frameworks have been proposed, highlighting the possibilities of AI-generated text detection. But in parallel to the development of detection frameworks, researchers have also concentrated on designing strategies to elude detection, i.e., focusing on the impossibilities of AI-generated text detection. This is a crucial step in order to make sure the detection frameworks are robust enough and it is not too easy to fool a detector. Despite the huge interest and the flurry of research in this domain, the community currently lacks a comprehensive analysis of recent developments. In this survey, we aim to provide a concise categorization and overview of current work encompassing both the prospects and the limitations of AI-generated text detection. To enrich the collective knowledge, we engage in an exhaustive discussion on critical and challenging open questions related to ongoing research on AI-generated text detection.

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.

Builds on

52 of 83 references.

References · 52

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  8. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  9. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  11. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  12. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
38 more
  1. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  2. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  3. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  4. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  5. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  6. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  7. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  8. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
  9. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
  10. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 259
  11. 2017Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translationcited by 232
  12. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 208
  13. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
  14. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
  15. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  16. 2020Answering Complex Open-Domain Questions with Multi-Hop Dense Retrievalcited by 160
  17. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
  18. 2021Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Modelscited by 159
  19. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  20. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  21. 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 98
  22. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 90
  23. 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
  24. 2023Protecting Language Generation Models via Invisible Watermarkingcited by 81
  25. 2023Three Bricks to Consolidate Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 80
  26. 2021Protecting Intellectual Property of Language Generation APIs with Lexical Watermarkcited by 78
  27. 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 73
  28. 2022CATER: Intellectual Property Protection on Text Generation APIs via Conditional Watermarkscited by 68
  29. 2023Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Modelscited by 55
  30. 2023An Unforgeable Publicly Verifiable Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 54
  31. 2023Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPTcited by 53
  32. 2022Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literaturecited by 45
  33. 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 40
  34. 2020Attacking Neural Text Detectorscited by 37
  35. 2023Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 35
  36. 2019Towards Near-imperceptible Steganographic Textcited by 30
  37. 2021Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Modelcited by 28
  38. 2023Bot or Human? Detecting ChatGPT Imposters with A Single Questioncited by 25

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 16; 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

28 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  2. 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 112
  3. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 79
  4. 2024Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Surveycited by 73
  5. 2024Zero-Shot Detection of AI-Generated Imagescited by 50
  6. 2024DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarioscited by 37
  7. 2025Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIscited by 35
  8. 2024TRAP: Targeted Random Adversarial Prompt Honeypot for Black-Box Identificationcited by 33
  9. 2023WaterBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 27
  10. 2024Who Wrote This? The Key to Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection Is GECScorecited by 27
  11. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutionscited by 24
  12. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methodscited by 23
16 more
  1. 2024AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsificationcited by 17
  2. 2024Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurementcited by 16
  3. 2025Human-LLM Coevolution: Evidence from Academic Writingcited by 15
  4. 2024A Practical Examination of AI-Generated Text Detectors for Large Language Modelscited by 11
  5. 2024A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversationscited by 9
  6. 2025Enhancing LLM Watermark Resilience Against Both Scrubbing and Spoofing Attackscited by 8
  7. 2025Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoptioncited by 7
  8. 2024ChatGPT Code Detection: Techniques for Uncovering the Source of Codecited by 6
  9. 2025Diversity Boosts AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 6
  10. 2025How does Misinformation Affect Large Language Model Behaviors and Preferences?cited by 5
  11. 2025Not all tokens are created equal: Perplexity Attention Weighted Networks for AI generated text detectioncited by 3
  12. 2025Robust and Fine-Grained Detection of AI Generated Textscited by 3
  13. 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?cited by 3
  14. 2026Why AI-Generated Text Detection Fails: Evidence from Explainable AI Beyond Benchmark Accuracycited by 2
  15. 2024Benchmarking of LLM Detection: Comparing Two Competing Approachescited by 1
  16. 2026Build it, Break it, Repeat: Benchmarking and improving LLM-manipulated disinformation detection in social media postscited by 0