mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who Wrote This? The Key to Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection Is GECScore

arXiv 2405.04286 ↗First posted 7 May 2024cs.CLcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The efficacy of detectors for texts generated by large language models (LLMs) substantially depends on the availability of large-scale training data. However, white-box zero-shot detectors, which require no such data, are limited by the accessibility of the source model of the LLM-generated text. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective black-box zero-shot detection approach based on the observation that, from the perspective of LLMs, human-written texts typically contain more grammatical errors than LLM-generated texts. This approach involves calculating the Grammar Error Correction Score (GECScore) for the given text to differentiate between human-written and LLM-generated text. Experimental results show that our method outperforms current state-of-the-art (SOTA) zero-shot and supervised methods, achieving an average AUROC of 98.62% across XSum and Writing Prompts dataset. Additionally, our approach demonstrates strong reliability in the wild, exhibiting robust generalization and resistance to paraphrasing attacks. Data and code are available at: https://github.com/NLP2CT/GECScore.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2024.

Builds on

39 of 75 references.

References · 39

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  7. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  8. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  9. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  10. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  11. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  12. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
27 more
  1. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  2. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  3. 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
  4. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  5. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  6. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  7. 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 504
  8. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  9. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  10. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  11. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  12. 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
  13. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  14. 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 251
  15. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  16. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
  17. 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
  18. 2023CoEdIT: Text Editing by Task-Specific Instruction Tuningcited by 67
  19. 2023ArguGPT: evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays generated by GPT modelscited by 41
  20. 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 40
  21. 2023HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT-generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysiscited by 30
  22. 2023Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Surveycited by 28
  23. 2023GrammarGPT: Exploring Open-Source LLMs for Native Chinese Grammatical Error Correction with Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 23
  24. 2022Semantic Similarity Metrics for Evaluating Source Code Summarizationcited by 14
  25. 2024Prefix Text as a Yarn: Eliciting Non-English Alignment in Foundation Language Modelcited by 10
  26. 2023RobustGEC: Robust Grammatical Error Correction Against Subtle Context Perturbationcited by 6
  27. 2022GPT-Neo for commonsense reasoning -- a theoretical and practical lenscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 9; 2026: 15.

27 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarioscited by 37
  2. 2025RepreGuard: Detecting LLM-Generated Text by Revealing Hidden Representation Patternscited by 24
  3. 2025Benchmarking the Detection of LLMs-Generated Modern Chinese Poetrycited by 10
  4. 2025DNA-DetectLLM: Unveiling AI-Generated Text via a DNA-Inspired Mutation-Repair Paradigmcited by 10
  5. 2025DivScore: Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text in Specialized Domainscited by 9
  6. 2025MoSEs: Uncertainty-Aware AI-Generated Text Detection via Mixture of Stylistics Experts with Conditional Thresholdscited by 9
  7. 2026AutoMonitor-Bench: Evaluating the Reliability of LLM-Based Misbehavior Monitorcited by 8
  8. 2025WETBench: A Benchmark for Detecting Task-Specific Machine-Generated Text on Wikipediacited by 6
  9. 2025Understanding and Mitigating Political Stance Cross-topic Generalization in Large Language Modelscited by 6
  10. 2025Large Language Model Sourcing: A Surveycited by 5
  11. 2024FOCUS: Forging Originality through Contrastive Use in Self-Plagiarism for Language Modelscited by 3
  12. 2024Towards Reliable Detection of LLM-Generated Texts: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework with CUDRTcited by 3
15 more
  1. 2026Beyond the Final Actor: Modeling the Dual Roles of Creator and Editor for Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  2. 2026DetectRL-X: Towards Reliable Multilingual and Real-World LLM-Generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  3. 2025Trends and Challenges in Authorship Analysis: A Review of ML, DL, and LLM Approachescited by 2
  4. 2026TSM-Bench: Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Real-World Wikipedia Editing Practicescited by 2
  5. 2026MAGA-Bench: Machine-Augment-Generated Text via Alignment Detection Benchmarkcited by 1
  6. 2026Seeing the Poem: Image-Semantic Detection of AI-Generated Modern Chinese Poetry with MLLMscited by 1
  7. 2026DetectZoo: A Unified Toolkit for AI-Generated Content Detection Across Text, Audio, and Image Modalitiescited by 1
  8. 2026ARB: A Matched Authorship-Rewriting Benchmark Dataset for AI-Text Detector Evaluationcited by 1
  9. 2026Code Fingerprints: Disentangled Attribution of LLM-Generated Codecited by 0
  10. 2026Adversarial Creation and Detection of AI-Generated Social Bot Contentcited by 0
  11. 2026DWT-Fusion: A Signal-Based Framework for Training-Free LLM-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
  12. 2026Linear Probing Provides Robust and Efficient Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 0
  13. 2026Detecting and Guiding LLM-Generated Korean Poetry with Interpretable Form-level Featurescited by 0
  14. 2026IndicDetect: Evaluating Cross-Lingual LLM-Generated Text Detection for Hindi, Telugu, and Tamilcited by 0
  15. 2026CrisisFake: Benchmark Validity of AI-Generated Text Detection for Disaster Social Sensingcited by 0