mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Protecting Intellectual Property of Language Generation APIs with Lexical Watermark

arXiv 2112.02701 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2021cs.CR cs.CLcited by 78

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, due to the breakthrough in natural language generation (NLG), including machine translation, document summarization, image captioning, etc NLG models have been encapsulated in cloud APIs to serve over half a billion people worldwide and process over one hundred billion word generations per day. Thus, NLG APIs have already become essential profitable services in many commercial companies. Due to the substantial financial and intellectual investments, service providers adopt a pay-as-you-use policy to promote sustainable market growth. However, recent works have shown that cloud platforms suffer from financial losses imposed by model extraction attacks, which aim to imitate the functionality and utility of the victim services, thus violating the intellectual property (IP) of cloud APIs. This work targets at protecting IP of NLG APIs by identifying the attackers who have utilized watermarked responses from the victim NLG APIs. However, most existing watermarking techniques are not directly amenable for IP protection of NLG APIs. To bridge this gap, we first present a novel watermarking method for text generation APIs by conducting lexical modification to the original outputs. Compared with the competitive baselines, our watermark approach achieves better identifiable performance in terms of p-value, with fewer semantic losses. In addition, our watermarks are more understandable and intuitive to humans than the baselines. Finally, the empirical studies show our approach is also applicable to queries from different domains, and is effective on the attacker trained on a mixture of the corpus which includes less than 10% watermarked samples.

Key facts. Cited by 78 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 32 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2021.

Builds on

32 of 53 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  7. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  8. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  9. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  10. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  11. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  12. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
20 more
  1. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  2. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  3. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
  4. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  5. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
  6. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  7. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
  8. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  9. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
  10. 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 227
  11. 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
  12. 2019Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIscited by 136
  13. 2016Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Wordscited by 114
  14. 2017Adversarial Frontier Stitching for Remote Neural Network Watermarkingcited by 110
  15. 2020Self-training Improves Pre-training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 96
  16. 2019DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networkscited by 94
  17. 2020Imitation Attacks and Defenses for Black-box Machine Translation Systemscited by 78
  18. 2018Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Datacited by 69
  19. 2021Model Extraction and Adversarial Transferability, Your BERT is Vulnerable!cited by 51
  20. 2020Protect, Show, Attend and Tell: Empowering Image Captioning Models with Ownership Protectioncited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 32; 2024: 20; 2025: 13; 2026: 10.

78 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  2. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
  3. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  4. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
  5. 2023Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generationcited by 116
  6. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 102
  7. 2023Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 92
  8. 2023Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicitycited by 86
  9. 2023When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 83
  10. 2023Protecting Language Generation Models via Invisible Watermarkingcited by 81
  11. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 79
  12. 2023Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Featurescited by 76
38 more
  1. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 72
  2. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 70
  3. 2023REMARK-LLM: A Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 64
  4. 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 64
  5. 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarkscited by 62
  6. 2023Are You Copying My Model? Protecting the Copyright of Large Language Models for EaaS via Backdoor Watermarkcited by 61
  7. 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactivecited by 52
  8. 2023Advancing Beyond Identification: Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  9. 2023A Pathway Towards Responsible AI Generated Contentcited by 38
  10. 2024Hey, That's My Model! Introducing Chain & Hash, An LLM Fingerprinting Techniquecited by 34
  11. 2023HuRef: HUman-REadable Fingerprint for Large Language Modelscited by 32
  12. 2022The Ethical Need for Watermarks in Machine-Generated Languagecited by 30
  13. 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Modelscited by 30
  14. 2022Distillation-Resistant Watermarking for Model Protection in NLPcited by 29
  15. 2023Integration of Large Language Models and Federated Learningcited by 28
  16. 2023CodeMark: Imperceptible Watermarking for Code Datasets against Neural Code Completion Modelscited by 28
  17. 2023Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Surveycited by 28
  18. 2023How to Protect Copyright Data in Optimization of Large Language Models?cited by 26
  19. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutionscited by 24
  20. 2023Embarrassingly Simple Text Watermarkscited by 23
  21. 2024Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas: A Surveycited by 23
  22. 2023WatME: Towards Lossless Watermarking Through Lexical Redundancycited by 22
  23. 2023Watermarking LLMs with Weight Quantizationcited by 19
  24. 2024Double-I Watermark: Protecting Model Copyright for LLM Fine-tuningcited by 18
  25. 2025BiMark: Unbiased Multilayer Watermarking for Large Language Modelscited by 18
  26. 2023G3Detector: General GPT-Generated Text Detectorcited by 17
  27. 2023Necessary and Sufficient Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 16
  28. 2024LLM Whisperer: An Inconspicuous Attack to Bias LLM Responsescited by 15
  29. 2023Challenges and Remedies to Privacy and Security in AIGC: Exploring the Potential of Privacy Computing, Blockchain, and Beyondcited by 14
  30. 2024Do LLMs Know to Respect Copyright Notice?cited by 12
  31. 2023Source Attribution for Large Language Model-Generated Datacited by 11
  32. 2023Watermarking Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Multi-modal Embedding as a Servicecited by 11
  33. 2025Blackbox Model Provenance via Palimpsestic Membership Inferencecited by 11
  34. 2023Wide Flat Minimum Watermarking for Robust Ownership Verification of GANscited by 10
  35. 2024WARDEN: Multi-Directional Backdoor Watermarks for Embedding-as-a-Service Copyright Protectioncited by 9
  36. 2025Unified attacks to large language model watermarks: spoofing and scrubbing in unauthorized knowledge distillationcited by 9
  37. 2024An Auditing Test To Detect Behavioral Shift in Language Modelscited by 8
  38. 2025MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Modelscited by 8

50 most cited of 78 All 78 (JSON)