mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CATER: Intellectual Property Protection on Text Generation APIs via Conditional Watermarks

arXiv 2209.08773 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2022cs.CRcited by 68

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous works have validated that text generation APIs can be stolen through imitation attacks, causing IP violations. In order to protect the IP of text generation APIs, a recent work has introduced a watermarking algorithm and utilized the null-hypothesis test as a post-hoc ownership verification on the imitation models. However, we find that it is possible to detect those watermarks via sufficient statistics of the frequencies of candidate watermarking words. To address this drawback, in this paper, we propose a novel Conditional wATERmarking framework (CATER) for protecting the IP of text generation APIs. An optimization method is proposed to decide the watermarking rules that can minimize the distortion of overall word distributions while maximizing the change of conditional word selections. Theoretically, we prove that it is infeasible for even the savviest attacker (they know how CATER works) to reveal the used watermarks from a large pool of potential word pairs based on statistical inspection. Empirically, we observe that high-order conditions lead to an exponential growth of suspicious (unused) watermarks, making our crafted watermarks more stealthy. In addition, cater can effectively identify the IP infringement under architectural mismatch and cross-domain imitation attacks, with negligible impairments on the generation quality of victim APIs. We envision our work as a milestone for stealthily protecting the IP of text generation APIs.

Key facts. Cited by 68 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 27; 2024: 26; 2025: 7; 2026: 8.

68 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  2. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
  3. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  4. 2023Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generationcited by 116
  5. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 102
  6. 2023Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicitycited by 86
  7. 2023When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 83
  8. 2023Protecting Language Generation Models via Invisible Watermarkingcited by 81
  9. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 79
  10. 2023Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Featurescited by 76
  11. 2023Use of LLMs for Illicit Purposes: Threats, Prevention Measures, and Vulnerabilitiescited by 76
  12. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 72
38 more
  1. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 70
  2. 2023REMARK-LLM: A Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 64
  3. 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 64
  4. 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarkscited by 62
  5. 2023Are You Copying My Model? Protecting the Copyright of Large Language Models for EaaS via Backdoor Watermarkcited by 61
  6. 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactivecited by 52
  7. 2024SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated Contentcited by 43
  8. 2024Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representationscited by 40
  9. 2023A Pathway Towards Responsible AI Generated Contentcited by 38
  10. 2024Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspectivecited by 35
  11. 2023HuRef: HUman-REadable Fingerprint for Large Language Modelscited by 32
  12. 2024GumbelSoft: Diversified Language Model Watermarking via the GumbelMax-trickcited by 31
  13. 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Modelscited by 30
  14. 2023Integration of Large Language Models and Federated Learningcited by 28
  15. 2023Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Surveycited by 28
  16. 2023How to Protect Copyright Data in Optimization of Large Language Models?cited by 26
  17. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutionscited by 24
  18. 2023Embarrassingly Simple Text Watermarkscited by 23
  19. 2024Detecting Machine-Generated Texts by Multi-Population Aware Optimization for Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 20
  20. 2023Watermarking LLMs with Weight Quantizationcited by 19
  21. 2025BiMark: Unbiased Multilayer Watermarking for Large Language Modelscited by 18
  22. 2025A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Modelscited by 18
  23. 2023G3Detector: General GPT-Generated Text Detectorcited by 17
  24. 2023Necessary and Sufficient Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 16
  25. 2024LLM Whisperer: An Inconspicuous Attack to Bias LLM Responsescited by 15
  26. 2025Attack and defense techniques in large language models: A survey and new perspectivescited by 13
  27. 2023Unmasking Transformers: A Theoretical Approach to Data Recovery via Attention Weightscited by 11
  28. 2025Blackbox Model Provenance via Palimpsestic Membership Inferencecited by 11
  29. 2023Wide Flat Minimum Watermarking for Robust Ownership Verification of GANscited by 10
  30. 2024WARDEN: Multi-Directional Backdoor Watermarks for Embedding-as-a-Service Copyright Protectioncited by 9
  31. 2024An Auditing Test To Detect Behavioral Shift in Language Modelscited by 8
  32. 2025Enhancing LLM Watermark Resilience Against Both Scrubbing and Spoofing Attackscited by 8
  33. 2026On Protecting Agentic Systems' Intellectual Property via Watermarkingcited by 7
  34. 2023A Theoretical Insight into Attack and Defense of Gradient Leakage in Transformercited by 6
  35. 2026Protecting Language Models Against Unauthorized Distillation through Trace Rewritingcited by 6
  36. 2024"Yes, My LoRD." Guiding Language Model Extraction with Locality Reinforced Distillationcited by 5
  37. 2024WET: Overcoming Paraphrasing Vulnerabilities in Embeddings-as-a-Service with Linear Transformation Watermarkscited by 5
  38. 2024Building Intelligence Identification System via Large Language Model Watermarking: A Survey and Beyondcited by 4

50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)