mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking of LLM Detection: Comparing Two Competing Approaches

arXiv 2406.11670 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article gives an overview of the field of LLM text recognition. Different approaches and implemented detectors for the recognition of LLM-generated text are presented. In addition to discussing the implementations, the article focuses on benchmarking the detectors. Although there are numerous software products for the recognition of LLM-generated text, with a focus on ChatGPT-like LLMs, the quality of the recognition (recognition rate) is not clear. Furthermore, while it can be seen that scientific contributions presenting their novel approaches strive for some kind of comparison with other approaches, the construction and independence of the evaluation dataset is often not comprehensible. As a result, discrepancies in the performance evaluation of LLM detectors are often visible due to the different benchmarking datasets. This article describes the creation of an evaluation dataset and uses this dataset to investigate the different detectors. The selected detectors are benchmarked against each other.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

Builds on

9 of 19 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  2. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  3. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
  4. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
  5. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
  6. 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
  7. 2020Attacking Neural Text Detectorscited by 39
  8. 2023Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Surveycited by 28
  9. 2020Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.